Effects on <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 Prevalence and Levels from Feeding Two Formulations of Direct-Fed Microbial to Feedlot Cattle

Preharvest interventions are critical to reduce beef carcass contamination with Escherichia coli O157:H7 during processing. We determined the effects of feeding two direct-fed microbials (DFMs), Bovamine Defend and 10-G, to beef cattle to suppress the prevalence and load of E. coli O157:H7 in the gastrointestinal tract. Each DFM was fed daily to eight pens of cattle (100 animals/pen) from May to September. Fecal swabs were collected from 23 to 25 animals/pen at midpoint (∼70 days on feed) and at the end of the feeding period (140 days on feed). Hide swabs were collected at the final sampling. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in feces ranged from 8% ( n = 193) in the samples collected at midpoint from the Bovamine Defend group to 25% ( n = 192) in the samples collected at the end of the feeding period from the 10-G group. After controlling for the effect of sampling occasion, cattle that were fed 10-G had 70% higher odds of E. coli O157:H7 positivity than cattle that were fed Bovamine Defend (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.1–2.7; p = 0.019). Overall, 15 of 386 (4%) and 27 of 384 (7%) fecal samples had quantifiable numbers of E. coli O157:H7 from the Bovamine Defend and 10-G groups, respectively. The total number of super-shedders from both sampling occasions did not statistically differ ( p &gt; 0.50) between groups. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 on hides (Bovamine Defend, 67.7% [ n = 192]; 10-G, 60.4% [ n = 192]) did not statistically differ ( p = 0.56) between treatment groups. Neither treatment prevented animals from super-shedding, much less shedding &gt;200 colony forming units of E. coli O157:H7/swab, a shedding level previously associated with high prevalence of cattle hide contamination, suggesting that neither treatment may be sufficiently efficacious as a preharvest intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15353141261472168
Primary Topic
Escherichia coli research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 Prevalence and Levels from Feeding Two Formulations of Direct-Fed Microbial to Feedlot Cattle

Terrance M. Arthur, Getahun E. Agga, Norasak Kalchayanand
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Escherichia coli research studies
article

Effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 Prevalence and Levels from Feeding Two Formulations of Direct-Fed Microbial to Feedlot Cattle

Terrance M. Arthur, Getahun E. Agga, Norasak Kalchayanand
article en

Abstract

Preharvest interventions are critical to reduce beef carcass contamination with Escherichia coli O157:H7 during processing. We determined the effects of feeding two direct-fed microbials (DFMs), Bovamine Defend and 10-G, to beef cattle to suppress the prevalence and load of E. coli O157:H7 in the gastrointestinal tract. Each DFM was fed daily to eight pens of cattle (100 animals/pen) from May to September. Fecal swabs were collected from 23 to 25 animals/pen at midpoint (∼70 days on feed) and at the end of the feeding period (140 days on feed). Hide swabs were collected at the final sampling. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in feces ranged from 8% ( n = 193) in the samples collected at midpoint from the Bovamine Defend group to 25% ( n = 192) in the samples collected at the end of the feeding period from the 10-G group. After controlling for the effect of sampling occasion, cattle that were fed 10-G had 70% higher odds of E. coli O157:H7 positivity than cattle that were fed Bovamine Defend (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.1–2.7; p = 0.019). Overall, 15 of 386 (4%) and 27 of 384 (7%) fecal samples had quantifiable numbers of E. coli O157:H7 from the Bovamine Defend and 10-G groups, respectively. The total number of super-shedders from both sampling occasions did not statistically differ ( p &gt; 0.50) between groups. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 on hides (Bovamine Defend, 67.7% [ n = 192]; 10-G, 60.4% [ n = 192]) did not statistically differ ( p = 0.56) between treatment groups. Neither treatment prevented animals from super-shedding, much less shedding &gt;200 colony forming units of E. coli O157:H7/swab, a shedding level previously associated with high prevalence of cattle hide contamination, suggesting that neither treatment may be sufficiently efficacious as a preharvest intervention.

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Escherichia coli research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.