Complementary Role of Whole-Body MRI and CT in Hematologic Malignancies and Bone Marrow Disorders

Whole-body cross-sectional imaging has largely replaced skeletal survey as the standard for evaluating hematologic malignancies and bone marrow disorders, but the practical choice between whole-body low-dose CT (WBCT) and whole-body MRI (WBMRI) remains incompletely resolved. This clinical review provides a practical, scenario-based comparison of WBCT and WBMRI across diagnosis, staging, treatment response, and surveillance. We emphasize real-world practical considerations, including scanner access, expertise, patient tolerance, radiation considerations, and cost. In multiple myeloma, with available comparative evidence, we include a focused research synthesis of 3 studies (152 patients) demonstrating high pooled CT-MRI concordance of 0.895 (95% CI: 0.834-0.935) with no detectable heterogeneity (I2=0%), supporting either modality as a reasonable first-line depending on the clinical question. Across all included disease categories, the broader pooled concordance estimate was 0.797 (95% CI: 0.667-0.885) with substantial heterogeneity reflecting variability in clinical context, reference standard, and protocol. WBMRI dominates in non-neoplastic marrow disorders where marrow characterization is essential. In lymphoma, FDG-PET/CT remains the standard for adult disease, with WBMRI most indicated in pediatrics and adolescents. Emerging CT techniques, including dual-energy CT with virtual noncalcium images and photon-counting detector CT, are extending CT into the marrow imaging space and narrowing the historical gap with MRI. Modality selection should be guided by the specific clinical scenario, available resources, and patient factors rather than by global judgments of modality superiority.