Risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and mendelian randomization analyses

Abstract Background The incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is rising globally. Existing meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have yielded inconsistent findings with uncertain evidence quality. Objectives This study aimed to synthesize available evidence and assess its credibility for potential risk factors of IPF. Methods We systematically searched 8 databases and selected meta-analyses and MR studies related to IPF risk factors from inception to March 11, 2025. We assessed the quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated MR studies using the STROBE-MR guidelines. We categorized the evidence into four levels and performed pooled analysis for risk factors reported in at least two MR studies. Results A total of 8 meta-analyses were included, reporting 22 associations, mainly involving genetics, infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables. According to the grading of evidence credibility, 12 were rated as suggestive associations, and 10 as weak associations. The overall credibility of the evidence is relatively low. The 36 MR studies investigated a total of 124 associations, with evidence grading showed 13 as robust, 90 as possible, 17 as suggestive, and 4 as insufficient. The pooled analysis identified 108 associations covering lifestyle, diet and nutrition, anthropometric indices, biomarkers, and clinical variables. The quality level of the included meta-analyses was low and critically low, while the MR studies strictly adhered to STROBE-MR, demonstrating good reporting quality. Conclusions This umbrella review uncovers the evidence regarding the associations between IPF risk and factors such as genetics, viral infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables through a comprehensive analysis of meta-analyses and MR studies. These findings provide an evidence base for IPF risk factor research and support clinical decisions and public health strategies. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024575341.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04519-1
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and mendelian randomization analyses

Huanrong Ruan, Wang Jm, Jiansheng Li, Hulei Zhao et al.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
article

Risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and mendelian randomization analyses

Huanrong Ruan, Wang Jm, Jiansheng Li, Hulei Zhao, Siyuan Lei, X J Zhou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is rising globally. Existing meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have yielded inconsistent findings with uncertain evidence quality. Objectives This study aimed to synthesize available evidence and assess its credibility for potential risk factors of IPF. Methods We systematically searched 8 databases and selected meta-analyses and MR studies related to IPF risk factors from inception to March 11, 2025. We assessed the quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated MR studies using the STROBE-MR guidelines. We categorized the evidence into four levels and performed pooled analysis for risk factors reported in at least two MR studies. Results A total of 8 meta-analyses were included, reporting 22 associations, mainly involving genetics, infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables. According to the grading of evidence credibility, 12 were rated as suggestive associations, and 10 as weak associations. The overall credibility of the evidence is relatively low. The 36 MR studies investigated a total of 124 associations, with evidence grading showed 13 as robust, 90 as possible, 17 as suggestive, and 4 as insufficient. The pooled analysis identified 108 associations covering lifestyle, diet and nutrition, anthropometric indices, biomarkers, and clinical variables. The quality level of the included meta-analyses was low and critically low, while the MR studies strictly adhered to STROBE-MR, demonstrating good reporting quality. Conclusions This umbrella review uncovers the evidence regarding the associations between IPF risk and factors such as genetics, viral infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables through a comprehensive analysis of meta-analyses and MR studies. These findings provide an evidence base for IPF risk factor research and support clinical decisions and public health strategies. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024575341.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.