On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception

Silent articulation influences the identification of ambiguous speech sounds. This effect has often been attributed to articulatory suppression—the idea that concurrent motor activity prevents the recruitment of motor resources that would normally support speech perception. However, silent articulation also generates motor, somatosensory, auditory, and phonological signals, any of which could potentially contribute to the effect. The objective of the three experiments reported here was to discriminate between articulatory suppression and these other potential origins of the silent-articulation effect on speech perception. To do so, we determined the minimal signal-to-noise ratio at which participants could discriminate between two pairs of syllables (labial/lingual and lingual/lingual) while repetitively moving the finger or performing a lip movement, either opening and closing the lips (Experiment 1), protruding and retracting the lips while keeping them pressed together (Experiment 2) or both (Experiment 3). Categorization performance for the two pairs of syllables during finger movement provided the baseline against which a putative effect of the lip movements on the labial/lingual pair was tested. The two lip movements engaged partly similar motor resources (contraction of the marginal part of the orbicularis oris). Only lip opening engaged motor planning and somatosensory feedback similar to those associated with one of the syllables used in the task. Neither of them engaged auditory or phonological factors. Only lip opening differently influenced the two types of syllables in comparison to the baseline. These findings suggest that our own mouth movements shape what we hear only when they resemble articulatory gestures of possible speech sounds. This challenges explanations based solely on motor-resource depletion or on phonological or auditory imagery and helps clarify how the motor system interacts with, but is not necessarily required for, speech perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63240-5
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception

Sarah Carneiro Pereira, Jean-François Patri, Gilles Vannuscorps
Scientific Reports
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

On the origin of the effect of silent articulation on speech perception

Sarah Carneiro Pereira, Jean-François Patri, Gilles Vannuscorps
article en

Abstract

Silent articulation influences the identification of ambiguous speech sounds. This effect has often been attributed to articulatory suppression—the idea that concurrent motor activity prevents the recruitment of motor resources that would normally support speech perception. However, silent articulation also generates motor, somatosensory, auditory, and phonological signals, any of which could potentially contribute to the effect. The objective of the three experiments reported here was to discriminate between articulatory suppression and these other potential origins of the silent-articulation effect on speech perception. To do so, we determined the minimal signal-to-noise ratio at which participants could discriminate between two pairs of syllables (labial/lingual and lingual/lingual) while repetitively moving the finger or performing a lip movement, either opening and closing the lips (Experiment 1), protruding and retracting the lips while keeping them pressed together (Experiment 2) or both (Experiment 3). Categorization performance for the two pairs of syllables during finger movement provided the baseline against which a putative effect of the lip movements on the labial/lingual pair was tested. The two lip movements engaged partly similar motor resources (contraction of the marginal part of the orbicularis oris). Only lip opening engaged motor planning and somatosensory feedback similar to those associated with one of the syllables used in the task. Neither of them engaged auditory or phonological factors. Only lip opening differently influenced the two types of syllables in comparison to the baseline. These findings suggest that our own mouth movements shape what we hear only when they resemble articulatory gestures of possible speech sounds. This challenges explanations based solely on motor-resource depletion or on phonological or auditory imagery and helps clarify how the motor system interacts with, but is not necessarily required for, speech perception.

Scientific Reports
UCLouvain (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.