The Language of Silence

Silence is polysemous, spanning affective, moral, political, and temporal dimensions. Typically defined as an absence (of sound, speech, or language), silence is also a presence and a material sign. This selective review of anthropological scholarship engaged with silence argues that, as an inherently contextual and cultural semiotic form, silence bears the signature features of any speech or listening act: It evokes a multiplicity of effects not necessarily known in advance. I highlight some of the meanings attached to being silenced or staying silent to show that while it may remain common to theorize silence in binary framings (e.g., silence/voice, victims/perpetrators, or oppression/resistance), another productive direction involves unsettling such rigid boundaries and framings. Using linguistic anthropological methods attuned to how different forms of silence intertwine with various genres of sociality and discursive or narrative forms, this review examines how silences are produced, enforced, challenged, or recast, by whom, and why.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041524-024928
Primary Topic
Sound Studies and Aurality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Language of Silence

Merav Shohet
Annual Review of Anthropology
Sound Studies and Aurality
article

The Language of Silence

Merav Shohet
article en

Abstract

Silence is polysemous, spanning affective, moral, political, and temporal dimensions. Typically defined as an absence (of sound, speech, or language), silence is also a presence and a material sign. This selective review of anthropological scholarship engaged with silence argues that, as an inherently contextual and cultural semiotic form, silence bears the signature features of any speech or listening act: It evokes a multiplicity of effects not necessarily known in advance. I highlight some of the meanings attached to being silenced or staying silent to show that while it may remain common to theorize silence in binary framings (e.g., silence/voice, victims/perpetrators, or oppression/resistance), another productive direction involves unsettling such rigid boundaries and framings. Using linguistic anthropological methods attuned to how different forms of silence intertwine with various genres of sociality and discursive or narrative forms, this review examines how silences are produced, enforced, challenged, or recast, by whom, and why.

Annual Review of Anthropology
Boston University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sound Studies and Aurality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Language of Silence — Merav Shohet · Annual Review of Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS