Understanding Relationship Boredom: A Thematic Analysis of Its Dimensions and Links to Sexual Boredom

Boredom is a common experience in long-term relationships, yet research on close relationships has often overlooked this experience and has particularly ignored the way it relates or contributes to sexual boredom. This study aimed to identify and describe dimensions of relationship boredom in individuals in romantic relationships and further understand its link to sexual boredom through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The study included a quantitative survey of 3,089 adults, 401 of whom provided open-ended qualitative responses to answer our research question. Around a quarter of our participants reported that they were experiencing relationship boredom in their current relationship. Thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative responses (n = 401) identified four major themes with several sub-themes: 1) protective factors: a) shared experiences, b) emotional connection, and c) independence and autonomy; 2) contributing factors: a) stagnation and monotony, b) sexual health, c) partner and relationship issues, and d) life-stressors; 3) coping strategies: a) effort and responsibility, b) connection and mutuality, and c) novelty and exploration; and 4) consequences: a) negative affect, b) infidelity, and c) relationship end. Overall, participants described relationship boredom as normal and cyclical, and provided intentional ways to manage it, while highlighting some structural barriers to doing this successfully. Findings are discussed using general boredom, self-expansion, and heteronormativity frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2026.2698018
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Relationship Boredom: A Thematic Analysis of Its Dimensions and Links to Sexual Boredom

Ian Kerner, Kristen P. Mark, Leonor de Oliveira
The Journal of Sex Research
Mind wandering and attention
article

Understanding Relationship Boredom: A Thematic Analysis of Its Dimensions and Links to Sexual Boredom

Ian Kerner, Kristen P. Mark, Leonor de Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Boredom is a common experience in long-term relationships, yet research on close relationships has often overlooked this experience and has particularly ignored the way it relates or contributes to sexual boredom. This study aimed to identify and describe dimensions of relationship boredom in individuals in romantic relationships and further understand its link to sexual boredom through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The study included a quantitative survey of 3,089 adults, 401 of whom provided open-ended qualitative responses to answer our research question. Around a quarter of our participants reported that they were experiencing relationship boredom in their current relationship. Thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative responses (n = 401) identified four major themes with several sub-themes: 1) protective factors: a) shared experiences, b) emotional connection, and c) independence and autonomy; 2) contributing factors: a) stagnation and monotony, b) sexual health, c) partner and relationship issues, and d) life-stressors; 3) coping strategies: a) effort and responsibility, b) connection and mutuality, and c) novelty and exploration; and 4) consequences: a) negative affect, b) infidelity, and c) relationship end. Overall, participants described relationship boredom as normal and cyclical, and provided intentional ways to manage it, while highlighting some structural barriers to doing this successfully. Findings are discussed using general boredom, self-expansion, and heteronormativity frameworks.

The Journal of Sex Research
University of Minnesota (US), IS practice (BE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.