Obesityand Gynaecological Cancers, with a Focus on Morbid Obesity: Risk Stratification, Early Diagnosis and Management

Obesity is a chronic, relapsing disease and a significant oncological risk factor. The correlation is most pronounced and consistent for endometrial cancer. Conversely, evidence linking obesity to ovarian cancer is less robust and varies by histotype, while the association with cervical cancer is influenced by factors related to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survival. This review examines obesity, particularly class III (morbid) obesity, in relation to the risk of gynaecological cancer, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies. A structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection was conducted for literature published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible evidence included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cohort and case–control studies, mechanistic studies and clinical guidance relevant to obesity and endometrial, ovarian or cervical cancer. Title/abstract screening and full-text selection were conducted using predefined criteria for conceptual relevance and clinical applicability. Excess adiposity contributes to endometrial carcinogenesis through hormonal dysregulation, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, adipokine imbalance, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress. In ovarian cancer, associations are generally weaker but appear more relevant for selected histological subtypes and cumulative adiposity exposure. In cervical cancer, obesity should not be interpreted as replacing HPV-driven pathogenesis; rather, it may affect screening adequacy, treatment selection, perioperative risk, and disease-specific survival in morbidly obese patients. Current evidence does not support morbid obesity as an independent driver of all gynaecological cancers. It supports obesity as a major modifiable risk factor and clinical modifier, particularly for endometrial cancer, and highlights the need for pragmatic risk stratification based on BMI class, adiposity distribution, metabolic comorbidity, functional status and cancer-site-specific pathways. Biomarker evidence remains hypothesis-generating, and obesity-integrated oncological pathways require prospective validation in patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16142295
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obesityand Gynaecological Cancers, with a Focus on Morbid Obesity: Risk Stratification, Early Diagnosis and Management

Anna Rulkiewicz, Karolina Piotrowska-Lis, Justyna Domienik‐Karłowicz, Anna Sztokinier et al.
Diagnostics
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Obesityand Gynaecological Cancers, with a Focus on Morbid Obesity: Risk Stratification, Early Diagnosis and Management

Anna Rulkiewicz, Karolina Piotrowska-Lis, Justyna Domienik‐Karłowicz, Anna Sztokinier, Magdalena Bizoń, Maciej Olszewski
article en

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic, relapsing disease and a significant oncological risk factor. The correlation is most pronounced and consistent for endometrial cancer. Conversely, evidence linking obesity to ovarian cancer is less robust and varies by histotype, while the association with cervical cancer is influenced by factors related to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survival. This review examines obesity, particularly class III (morbid) obesity, in relation to the risk of gynaecological cancer, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies. A structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection was conducted for literature published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible evidence included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cohort and case–control studies, mechanistic studies and clinical guidance relevant to obesity and endometrial, ovarian or cervical cancer. Title/abstract screening and full-text selection were conducted using predefined criteria for conceptual relevance and clinical applicability. Excess adiposity contributes to endometrial carcinogenesis through hormonal dysregulation, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, adipokine imbalance, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress. In ovarian cancer, associations are generally weaker but appear more relevant for selected histological subtypes and cumulative adiposity exposure. In cervical cancer, obesity should not be interpreted as replacing HPV-driven pathogenesis; rather, it may affect screening adequacy, treatment selection, perioperative risk, and disease-specific survival in morbidly obese patients. Current evidence does not support morbid obesity as an independent driver of all gynaecological cancers. It supports obesity as a major modifiable risk factor and clinical modifier, particularly for endometrial cancer, and highlights the need for pragmatic risk stratification based on BMI class, adiposity distribution, metabolic comorbidity, functional status and cancer-site-specific pathways. Biomarker evidence remains hypothesis-generating, and obesity-integrated oncological pathways require prospective validation in patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(14)
Virgin Care (GB), Central Clinical Hospital (PL), Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny (PL), Lux Research (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.