The Diastasis Rectus Abdominis Questionnaire (DRAQ): development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the biopsychosocial impact of diastasis rectus abdominis in parous females

Abstract Background To develop Spanish and English versions of the Diastasis Rectus Abdominis Questionnaire (DRAQ) to quantify the biopsychosocial impact of diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) in adults assigned female at birth, and to test psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Methods Items were generated from a systematic review and a survey ( n = 319) with qualitative coding mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. An expert panel ( n = 11) and Spanish pilot test ( n = 30) assessed comprehensibility, comprehensiveness and relevance. The English version was produced by transcultural adaptation and pilot tested for content validity ( n = 30). Spanish psychometrics were evaluated in a validation sample ( n = 137): internal consistency, test–retest reliability ( n = 80; 7–10 days), convergent validity and exploratory factor analysis. Results Thirty-three items were drafted; six were removed, yielding a 27-item DRAQ in Spanish and English with content validity. The Spanish DRAQ showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.969) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.941). Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors: physical/functional impact and psychosocial impact. Conclusions The DRAQ is a patient-reported measure of disability-relevant biopsychosocial impact of DRA; the Spanish version is reliable with a two-factor structure, and the English version shows content validity for use alongside clinical examination. Trial registration NCT04158180, Date of registration: 04/11/2019.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04718-2
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diastasis Rectus Abdominis Questionnaire (DRAQ): development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the biopsychosocial impact of diastasis rectus abdominis in parous females

Laura Fuentes‐Aparicio, G Donnelly, Hayley Mills, Montserrat Rejano‐Campo et al.
BMC Women s Health
Hernia repair and management
article

The Diastasis Rectus Abdominis Questionnaire (DRAQ): development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the biopsychosocial impact of diastasis rectus abdominis in parous females

Laura Fuentes‐Aparicio, G Donnelly, Hayley Mills, Montserrat Rejano‐Campo, Raúl Ferrer‐Peña, Paul W. Hodges, Victoria Vicente-Campos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To develop Spanish and English versions of the Diastasis Rectus Abdominis Questionnaire (DRAQ) to quantify the biopsychosocial impact of diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) in adults assigned female at birth, and to test psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Methods Items were generated from a systematic review and a survey ( n = 319) with qualitative coding mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. An expert panel ( n = 11) and Spanish pilot test ( n = 30) assessed comprehensibility, comprehensiveness and relevance. The English version was produced by transcultural adaptation and pilot tested for content validity ( n = 30). Spanish psychometrics were evaluated in a validation sample ( n = 137): internal consistency, test–retest reliability ( n = 80; 7–10 days), convergent validity and exploratory factor analysis. Results Thirty-three items were drafted; six were removed, yielding a 27-item DRAQ in Spanish and English with content validity. The Spanish DRAQ showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.969) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.941). Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors: physical/functional impact and psychosocial impact. Conclusions The DRAQ is a patient-reported measure of disability-relevant biopsychosocial impact of DRA; the Spanish version is reliable with a two-factor structure, and the English version shows content validity for use alongside clinical examination. Trial registration NCT04158180, Date of registration: 04/11/2019.

BMC Women s Health
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES), Queensland Health (AU), Universitat de València (ES), The University of Queensland (AU), Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (GB), Madrid Health Service (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.