Motor cortical excitability is differentially modulated by HIIT and strength exercise

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and strength exercise (SE) induce corticospinal plasticity in exercised and non-exercised muscles. While HIIT's systemic neuromodulatory effects are well-established, SE's comparable remote responses remain unclear. This study investigated changes in corticospinal, intracortical, and spinal excitability, as well as motor performance, in non-exercised flexor carpi radialis following single-session HIIT and plantar flexion SE. Using a randomised crossover design, eighteen participants completed: (1) 20-minute high-intensity interval cycling, (2) high-intensity resistive plantar flexion, and (3) control. Corticospinal responses were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation; motor performance through reaction time tasks and maximum voluntary force at baseline and post-exercise. Only HIIT significantly increased motor-evoked potential amplitude (p = 0.002) and reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition (p = 0.04). HIIT reduced silent period duration compared to baseline and control (p <0.001), while SE showed reduction only versus control (p <0.001). Both HIIT and SE improved reaction time compared to baseline and control (p <0.05). These findings highlight differential corticospinal responses in a remote, non-exercised muscle, with HIIT inducing distributed excitability enhancements compared to SE. Unilateral, small-muscle SE may be insufficient to induce widespread corticospinal excitability changes, with implications for neurorehabilitation strategies targeting remote muscle groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2705072
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor cortical excitability is differentially modulated by HIIT and strength exercise

Jamie Tallent, Mohamad Rostami, Yonas Akalu, Dawson J. Kidgell et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Motor cortical excitability is differentially modulated by HIIT and strength exercise

Jamie Tallent, Mohamad Rostami, Yonas Akalu, Dawson J. Kidgell, Ashlyn K. Frazer, Ummatul Siddique, Annemarie Lee, Simon Walker
article en

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and strength exercise (SE) induce corticospinal plasticity in exercised and non-exercised muscles. While HIIT's systemic neuromodulatory effects are well-established, SE's comparable remote responses remain unclear. This study investigated changes in corticospinal, intracortical, and spinal excitability, as well as motor performance, in non-exercised flexor carpi radialis following single-session HIIT and plantar flexion SE. Using a randomised crossover design, eighteen participants completed: (1) 20-minute high-intensity interval cycling, (2) high-intensity resistive plantar flexion, and (3) control. Corticospinal responses were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation; motor performance through reaction time tasks and maximum voluntary force at baseline and post-exercise. Only HIIT significantly increased motor-evoked potential amplitude (p = 0.002) and reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition (p = 0.04). HIIT reduced silent period duration compared to baseline and control (p <0.001), while SE showed reduction only versus control (p <0.001). Both HIIT and SE improved reaction time compared to baseline and control (p <0.05). These findings highlight differential corticospinal responses in a remote, non-exercised muscle, with HIIT inducing distributed excitability enhancements compared to SE. Unilateral, small-muscle SE may be insufficient to induce widespread corticospinal excitability changes, with implications for neurorehabilitation strategies targeting remote muscle groups.

Journal of Sports Sciences
University of Essex (GB), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Gondar (ET), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.