ENSO‐Conditioned Evolution of Global Mean Surface Temperature

Abstract Here we examined how the June–May trajectory of global mean surface temperature (GMST) can be anticipated from recent GMST evolution and upcoming boreal winter Niño‐3.4 values. Principal component analysis and dimension reduction led to a simple, interpretable model in which the June–May monthly GMST trajectory is conditioned on two quantities: the average GMST of the prior 12 months and the upcoming December value of Niño‐3.4. Including ENSO improves performance relative to persistence baselines that do not include ENSO, especially during times of the year when atmospheric bridge mechanisms are active. The model associates a December Niño‐3.4 anomaly of 1°C with a GMST increase of about 0.03°C during June–August followed by a peak increase of about 0.11°C in the following February. In comparison, initialized climate forecasts show broadly similar ENSO–GMST relationships and provide additional skill prior to the ENSO peak.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl124175
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENSO‐Conditioned Evolution of Global Mean Surface Temperature

Michael K. Tippett, Emily Becker
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

ENSO‐Conditioned Evolution of Global Mean Surface Temperature

Michael K. Tippett, Emily Becker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Here we examined how the June–May trajectory of global mean surface temperature (GMST) can be anticipated from recent GMST evolution and upcoming boreal winter Niño‐3.4 values. Principal component analysis and dimension reduction led to a simple, interpretable model in which the June–May monthly GMST trajectory is conditioned on two quantities: the average GMST of the prior 12 months and the upcoming December value of Niño‐3.4. Including ENSO improves performance relative to persistence baselines that do not include ENSO, especially during times of the year when atmospheric bridge mechanisms are active. The model associates a December Niño‐3.4 anomaly of 1°C with a GMST increase of about 0.03°C during June–August followed by a peak increase of about 0.11°C in the following February. In comparison, initialized climate forecasts show broadly similar ENSO–GMST relationships and provide additional skill prior to the ENSO peak.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(14)
University of Miami (US), Columbia University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.