Proportional Nodal Burden as a Marker of Recurrence Risk in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Ratio

Background: Pathological N staging remains central to prognostic assessment in colorectal adenocarcinoma; however, it captures nodal disease as an absolute count and does not account for the total number of examined lymph nodes. The lymph node ratio (LNR) may refine postoperative risk stratification by integrating both metastatic nodal burden and lymph node yield. This study evaluated the prognostic value of LNR in a contemporary surgical cohort of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery for histopathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma at the Surgical Oncology Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2020 and 25 March 2026. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded from the primary curative-intent analysis. LNR was calculated as the number of metastatic lymph nodes divided by the total number of harvested lymph nodes and categorized as 0, 0.01–0.20, and >0.20. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of histopathological diagnosis, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated from the date of curative-intent surgery. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 309 screened patients, 274 non-metastatic patients constituted the final analytic cohort. LNR categories were LNR 0 in 159 patients (58.0%), LNR 0.01–0.20 in 76 patients (27.7%), and LNR > 0.20 in 39 patients (14.2%). Median observed follow-up was 24.1 months [IQR, 13.9–35.8] for OS and 22.4 months [IQR, 10.8–34.3] for DFS. During follow-up, 60 deaths and 90 DFS events occurred. Three-year OS was 76.4%, 71.5%, and 53.4% across the three LNR groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.014), whereas 3-year DFS was 74.7%, 62.4%, and 9.6%, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LNR > 0.20 remained independently associated with impaired DFS (adjusted HR 4.84 (95% CI 2.77–8.46); p < 0.001), whereas its association with OS was attenuated after adjustment. Conclusions: In patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, LNR > 0.20 identifies a high-risk subgroup with markedly impaired disease-free survival. LNR may complement conventional N staging and improve postoperative recurrence-risk stratification using information already available in routine pathology reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15145743
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportional Nodal Burden as a Marker of Recurrence Risk in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Ratio

Gizem GÜNEŞ, Adem Özcan
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Proportional Nodal Burden as a Marker of Recurrence Risk in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Ratio

Gizem GÜNEŞ, Adem Özcan
article en

Abstract

Background: Pathological N staging remains central to prognostic assessment in colorectal adenocarcinoma; however, it captures nodal disease as an absolute count and does not account for the total number of examined lymph nodes. The lymph node ratio (LNR) may refine postoperative risk stratification by integrating both metastatic nodal burden and lymph node yield. This study evaluated the prognostic value of LNR in a contemporary surgical cohort of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery for histopathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma at the Surgical Oncology Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2020 and 25 March 2026. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded from the primary curative-intent analysis. LNR was calculated as the number of metastatic lymph nodes divided by the total number of harvested lymph nodes and categorized as 0, 0.01–0.20, and >0.20. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of histopathological diagnosis, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated from the date of curative-intent surgery. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 309 screened patients, 274 non-metastatic patients constituted the final analytic cohort. LNR categories were LNR 0 in 159 patients (58.0%), LNR 0.01–0.20 in 76 patients (27.7%), and LNR > 0.20 in 39 patients (14.2%). Median observed follow-up was 24.1 months [IQR, 13.9–35.8] for OS and 22.4 months [IQR, 10.8–34.3] for DFS. During follow-up, 60 deaths and 90 DFS events occurred. Three-year OS was 76.4%, 71.5%, and 53.4% across the three LNR groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.014), whereas 3-year DFS was 74.7%, 62.4%, and 9.6%, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LNR > 0.20 remained independently associated with impaired DFS (adjusted HR 4.84 (95% CI 2.77–8.46); p < 0.001), whereas its association with OS was attenuated after adjustment. Conclusions: In patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, LNR > 0.20 identifies a high-risk subgroup with markedly impaired disease-free survival. LNR may complement conventional N staging and improve postoperative recurrence-risk stratification using information already available in routine pathology reports.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(14)
Bilkent University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Başkent University Hospital (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.