Power Distance and Diversity Training Programs: A Multilevel Framework Linking Training Design, Employee Responses, and Effectiveness

This study examines how power distance (PD) at the national and individual levels may shape diversity training program (DTP) design and employees’ psychological responses. Specifically, it explores how national PD values may shape organizational DTP design characteristics and how individual PD orientations influence employees’ psychological responses. The study synthesizes conceptual, theoretical, and empirical research published between 2000 and 2026 to identify recurring themes across DTP design, cultural values, and employee psychological responses, which informed the development of a multilevel conceptual framework. The proposed framework distinguishes between organizational DTP design characteristics, employee psychological responses, and perceived DTP effectiveness across national and individual levels of analysis. A number of propositions are then developed to guide future research and inform culturally responsive DTP design practices. The findings suggest that DTPs may operate differently across cultural and organizational contexts, with PD representing an important yet underexplored contextual dimension shaping these differences. Perceived DTP effectiveness is further proposed to depend on the alignment between organizational DTP design characteristics and employees’ individual PD orientations. The study contributes to DTP research by highlighting the importance of aligning organizational DTP design characteristics with employees’ individual PD orientations when designing culturally responsive DTPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16070350
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Distance and Diversity Training Programs: A Multilevel Framework Linking Training Design, Employee Responses, and Effectiveness

Hussain Alhejji
Administrative Sciences
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Power Distance and Diversity Training Programs: A Multilevel Framework Linking Training Design, Employee Responses, and Effectiveness

Hussain Alhejji
article en

Abstract

This study examines how power distance (PD) at the national and individual levels may shape diversity training program (DTP) design and employees’ psychological responses. Specifically, it explores how national PD values may shape organizational DTP design characteristics and how individual PD orientations influence employees’ psychological responses. The study synthesizes conceptual, theoretical, and empirical research published between 2000 and 2026 to identify recurring themes across DTP design, cultural values, and employee psychological responses, which informed the development of a multilevel conceptual framework. The proposed framework distinguishes between organizational DTP design characteristics, employee psychological responses, and perceived DTP effectiveness across national and individual levels of analysis. A number of propositions are then developed to guide future research and inform culturally responsive DTP design practices. The findings suggest that DTPs may operate differently across cultural and organizational contexts, with PD representing an important yet underexplored contextual dimension shaping these differences. Perceived DTP effectiveness is further proposed to depend on the alignment between organizational DTP design characteristics and employees’ individual PD orientations. The study contributes to DTP research by highlighting the importance of aligning organizational DTP design characteristics with employees’ individual PD orientations when designing culturally responsive DTPs.

Administrative SciencesVol. 16(7)
Prince Sultan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.