Work restrictions and Unfitness to work: Prevalence and risk factors a cross-sectional study on 70 000 occupational visits

Background Few studies have assessed work restrictions and unfitness to work simultaneously, particularly on large populations, and evidence on their main influencing factors remains limited. Objective To assess prevalence and risk factors of work restrictions and unfitness to work. Method We included all visits conducted in occupational health departments of the Cher, over two consecutive years. Visits had to have a conclusion: fitness to work, temporary work restrictions, permanent work restrictions, and unfitness to work. Mixed multinomial models with individual random effects were used. Results Among the 71,848 occupational health visits, 62,436 had a conclusion. Most (90.6%, 95 CI 90.4 to 90.8%) were fit to work, 3.2% (3.1 to 3.3%) had temporary restrictions, 4.9% (4.7 to 5.1%) had permanent restrictions, and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4%) were unfit to work. The risk of temporary restrictions was multiplied by 1.69 (1.16 to 2.48) in workers over 55 vs < 25 years old; by 1.74 (1.42 to 2.14) in workers with disabilities; by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers with 10–20 vs < 5 years of seniority; and by 1.57 (1.22 to 2.01) in companies with 50–199 vs < 10 workers. The risk of permanent restrictions was multiplied by 2.24 (1.68 to 2.97) in workers over 55 yo; by 1.86 (1.57 to 2.21) in workers with disabilities; by 1.47 (1.05 to 2.06) for qualified workers; by 1.24 (1.05 to 1.46) for workers with 10–20 years of seniority; and by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers in companies with 50–199 employees. The risk of unfitness to work decreased with increasing seniority in the company, while a significant interaction between sex and sector of activity was observed for temporary restrictions. Conclusion Nearly one worker out of ten were unfit to work or had restrictions. The main risk factors for both unfit to work and restrictions were older age, women, and return-to-work visits; whereas lower seniority and smaller companies were risk factors for unfit to work, and longer seniority and bigger companies were risk factors for restrictions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353939
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work restrictions and Unfitness to work: Prevalence and risk factors a cross-sectional study on 70 000 occupational visits

Bruno Pereira, Luther Dogbla, Fréderic Dutheil, Jiao Jiao et al.
PLoS ONE
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Work restrictions and Unfitness to work: Prevalence and risk factors a cross-sectional study on 70 000 occupational visits

Bruno Pereira, Luther Dogbla, Fréderic Dutheil, Jiao Jiao, Marek Žák, Florence Thorin, Anne-Sophie Escobar, Julien S. Baker, Cédric Gouvenelle
article en

Abstract

Background Few studies have assessed work restrictions and unfitness to work simultaneously, particularly on large populations, and evidence on their main influencing factors remains limited. Objective To assess prevalence and risk factors of work restrictions and unfitness to work. Method We included all visits conducted in occupational health departments of the Cher, over two consecutive years. Visits had to have a conclusion: fitness to work, temporary work restrictions, permanent work restrictions, and unfitness to work. Mixed multinomial models with individual random effects were used. Results Among the 71,848 occupational health visits, 62,436 had a conclusion. Most (90.6%, 95 CI 90.4 to 90.8%) were fit to work, 3.2% (3.1 to 3.3%) had temporary restrictions, 4.9% (4.7 to 5.1%) had permanent restrictions, and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4%) were unfit to work. The risk of temporary restrictions was multiplied by 1.69 (1.16 to 2.48) in workers over 55 vs < 25 years old; by 1.74 (1.42 to 2.14) in workers with disabilities; by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers with 10–20 vs < 5 years of seniority; and by 1.57 (1.22 to 2.01) in companies with 50–199 vs < 10 workers. The risk of permanent restrictions was multiplied by 2.24 (1.68 to 2.97) in workers over 55 yo; by 1.86 (1.57 to 2.21) in workers with disabilities; by 1.47 (1.05 to 2.06) for qualified workers; by 1.24 (1.05 to 1.46) for workers with 10–20 years of seniority; and by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers in companies with 50–199 employees. The risk of unfitness to work decreased with increasing seniority in the company, while a significant interaction between sex and sector of activity was observed for temporary restrictions. Conclusion Nearly one worker out of ten were unfit to work or had restrictions. The main risk factors for both unfit to work and restrictions were older age, women, and return-to-work visits; whereas lower seniority and smaller companies were risk factors for unfit to work, and longer seniority and bigger companies were risk factors for restrictions.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.