How understanding the diversity of perspectives and systems in governments can increase the impact of scientific research

Abstract The COVID-19 crisis required scientists worldwide to contribute to complex, hectic, and unfamiliar governmental decision-processes. In this Perspective, we reflect on this intense interaction between science and health policy for pandemic response, drawing from the experience of infectious disease modellers across the world. We highlight the diversity of actors and interests in government, aiming to demystify the elusive ‘policy makers’. We present a general taxonomy to help research scientists more effectively support evidence-based policy. We stress the importance of building and maintaining relationships appropriate to the diverse pool of government actors. Not recognising this diversity may lead to miscommunication and reduce the positive impacts of scientific evidence for public policy in crisis and non-crisis situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Health
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44528-026-00009-2
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How understanding the diversity of perspectives and systems in governments can increase the impact of scientific research

Louise Dyson, James M. McCaw, Francisco J. Pérez‐Reche, Amira Kebir et al.
Communications Health
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

How understanding the diversity of perspectives and systems in governments can increase the impact of scientific research

Louise Dyson, James M. McCaw, Francisco J. Pérez‐Reche, Amira Kebir, Hans Heesterbeek, Liza Hadley, Julia R. Gog, Denis Mollison, Slimane Ben Miled, Emily Howerton, SM Thumbi, Cécile Tran-Kiem, Michael J. Plank, Robin N. Thompson, Stephen M. Kissler, Valerie Isham, Hannah E. Clapham, Bimandra A. Djaafara, Kathy Leung, Matt Keeling, Chris Erwin G. Mercado, Emma McBryde, Lorenzo Pellis, Edward M. Hill, Wirichada Pan-ngum, Sebastian Funk, Justin Lessler
article en

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 crisis required scientists worldwide to contribute to complex, hectic, and unfamiliar governmental decision-processes. In this Perspective, we reflect on this intense interaction between science and health policy for pandemic response, drawing from the experience of infectious disease modellers across the world. We highlight the diversity of actors and interests in government, aiming to demystify the elusive ‘policy makers’. We present a general taxonomy to help research scientists more effectively support evidence-based policy. We stress the importance of building and maintaining relationships appropriate to the diverse pool of government actors. Not recognising this diversity may lead to miscommunication and reduce the positive impacts of scientific evidence for public policy in crisis and non-crisis situations.

Communications HealthVol. 1(1)
Tunis University (TN), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nairobi (KE), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), King's College London (GB), University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Utrecht University (NL), University of Aberdeen (GB), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Princeton University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK), University of Manchester (GB), University of Indonesia (ID), Heriot-Watt University (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Institut Pasteur de Tunis (TN), National University Health System (SG), Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool (GB), Te Pūnaha Matatini, University College London (GB), Tunis El Manar University (TN), Washington State University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.