Exploring epistemic methods of accounting through language games: a pragmatic constructivist approach

Purpose This study proposes a methodology for exploring and conceptualizing epistemic methods of accounting through language games. Language games reveal varying levels of sophistication in practical reasoning and communicative interaction, shaping how accounting knowledge and practices unfold in local contexts. By examining the language games of skilled accountants in practice, the study aims to generate detailed knowledge that addresses real-world accounting problems. Design/methodology/approach Pragmatic constructivism serves as the paradigmatic foundation for developing the POLGA method (Pragmatic constructivist Operationalization of Language Games in Accounting). POLGA provides a framework for researchers to apply the concept of language games in accounting research to explore and conceptualize how actors design, implement and use accounting practices through epistemic methods. The method is illustrated through examples drawn from two research projects. Findings This study shows how researchers can use POLGA to identify and theorize epistemic methods of accounting while capturing the technical and social nuances embedded in the practical reasoning through which accounting phenomena are enacted. The empirical illustrations demonstrate POLGA’s capacity to reveal multiple epistemic methods of accounting. Research limitations/implications POLGA offers a nuanced perspective on accounting by highlighting the central role of epistemic methods in effective practice. It provides a methodological reference for accounting researchers interested in going beneath the surface of observable practices to understand the forms of practical reasoning through which knowledge is produced, communicated, mobilized and translated into action. Its use requires access to rich empirical material and sensitivity to the situated nature of organizational practices. Developed in accounting, POLGA also suggests that its underlying approach can be extended beyond this field, opening the way to POLG(X) as a methodology for qualitative researchers studying how knowledge is produced and used across different fields of practice. Originality/value POLGA provides a comprehensive epistemological apparatus for exploring and conceptualizing accounting language games in the making, epistemic methods and their effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-10-2024-0237
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring epistemic methods of accounting through language games: a pragmatic constructivist approach

Hanne Nørreklit, Fabio Magnacca, Jakob Mathias Liboriussen
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Exploring epistemic methods of accounting through language games: a pragmatic constructivist approach

Hanne Nørreklit, Fabio Magnacca, Jakob Mathias Liboriussen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study proposes a methodology for exploring and conceptualizing epistemic methods of accounting through language games. Language games reveal varying levels of sophistication in practical reasoning and communicative interaction, shaping how accounting knowledge and practices unfold in local contexts. By examining the language games of skilled accountants in practice, the study aims to generate detailed knowledge that addresses real-world accounting problems. Design/methodology/approach Pragmatic constructivism serves as the paradigmatic foundation for developing the POLGA method (Pragmatic constructivist Operationalization of Language Games in Accounting). POLGA provides a framework for researchers to apply the concept of language games in accounting research to explore and conceptualize how actors design, implement and use accounting practices through epistemic methods. The method is illustrated through examples drawn from two research projects. Findings This study shows how researchers can use POLGA to identify and theorize epistemic methods of accounting while capturing the technical and social nuances embedded in the practical reasoning through which accounting phenomena are enacted. The empirical illustrations demonstrate POLGA’s capacity to reveal multiple epistemic methods of accounting. Research limitations/implications POLGA offers a nuanced perspective on accounting by highlighting the central role of epistemic methods in effective practice. It provides a methodological reference for accounting researchers interested in going beneath the surface of observable practices to understand the forms of practical reasoning through which knowledge is produced, communicated, mobilized and translated into action. Its use requires access to rich empirical material and sensitivity to the situated nature of organizational practices. Developed in accounting, POLGA also suggests that its underlying approach can be extended beyond this field, opening the way to POLG(X) as a methodology for qualitative researchers studying how knowledge is produced and used across different fields of practice. Originality/value POLGA provides a comprehensive epistemological apparatus for exploring and conceptualizing accounting language games in the making, epistemic methods and their effects.

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
University of Pisa (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus Business College (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.