Comparison of Trigonometric Distribution Families Under Classical and Bayesian Approaches

This study aims to compare the performance of trigonometric families of distributions, sine-G, cosine-G, and tangent-G, using the inverse Weibull distribution as a baseline, and to guide model selection for six different data structures. Six real datasets with varying distributional characteristics, including right-skewed, left-skewed, and symmetric patterns, were used for comparison and analysis. Model performance was evaluated using both classical and Bayesian model comparison approaches. Across all six datasets, the sine-G family consistently outperformed the cosine-G and tangent-G families using inverse Weibull as a base distribution. The trigonometric families showed strong suitability for right-skewed data but demonstrated limited effectiveness for left-skewed and symmetric datasets. For the Sin-IW model, strong goodness-of-fit performance was observed across datasets with different skewness patterns. For right-skewed datasets (Datasets 1 and 3), the model produced AIC values of 437.4989 and 118.6208 with corresponding KS p-values of 0.9359 and 0.8771. For the symmetric dataset (Dataset 2), the AIC and KS p-value were 118.0071 and 0.6631, respectively. For moderately left-skewed (Dataset 4) and left-skewed data (Dataset 6), the AIC values were 128.1826 and 112.0453 with KS p-values of 0.3138 and 0.0774. For the extremely right-skewed dataset (Dataset 5), the model achieved an AIC of 68.5246 and a KS p-value of 0.9960. Bayesian model comparison further supported the superiority of the Sin-IW model. For Dataset 1, the WAIC values were 474.40 (Sin-IW), 474.60 (Cos-IW), and 493.50 (Tan-IW), while for Dataset 6, the WAIC values were 200.60 (Sin-IW), 207.90 (Cos-IW), and 209.70 (Tan-IW), confirming that Sin-IW demonstrated a good fit for classical and Bayesian inference. These results highlight the robustness of the Sin-G family among trigonometric distributions and offer practical insights for selecting appropriate models when analyzing data with diverse distributional features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/data11070182
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Trigonometric Distribution Families Under Classical and Bayesian Approaches

Laxmi Prasad Sapkota, Nirajan Bam, Pankaj Kumar, Vijay Kumar
Data
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
article

Comparison of Trigonometric Distribution Families Under Classical and Bayesian Approaches

Laxmi Prasad Sapkota, Nirajan Bam, Pankaj Kumar, Vijay Kumar
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the performance of trigonometric families of distributions, sine-G, cosine-G, and tangent-G, using the inverse Weibull distribution as a baseline, and to guide model selection for six different data structures. Six real datasets with varying distributional characteristics, including right-skewed, left-skewed, and symmetric patterns, were used for comparison and analysis. Model performance was evaluated using both classical and Bayesian model comparison approaches. Across all six datasets, the sine-G family consistently outperformed the cosine-G and tangent-G families using inverse Weibull as a base distribution. The trigonometric families showed strong suitability for right-skewed data but demonstrated limited effectiveness for left-skewed and symmetric datasets. For the Sin-IW model, strong goodness-of-fit performance was observed across datasets with different skewness patterns. For right-skewed datasets (Datasets 1 and 3), the model produced AIC values of 437.4989 and 118.6208 with corresponding KS p-values of 0.9359 and 0.8771. For the symmetric dataset (Dataset 2), the AIC and KS p-value were 118.0071 and 0.6631, respectively. For moderately left-skewed (Dataset 4) and left-skewed data (Dataset 6), the AIC values were 128.1826 and 112.0453 with KS p-values of 0.3138 and 0.0774. For the extremely right-skewed dataset (Dataset 5), the model achieved an AIC of 68.5246 and a KS p-value of 0.9960. Bayesian model comparison further supported the superiority of the Sin-IW model. For Dataset 1, the WAIC values were 474.40 (Sin-IW), 474.60 (Cos-IW), and 493.50 (Tan-IW), while for Dataset 6, the WAIC values were 200.60 (Sin-IW), 207.90 (Cos-IW), and 209.70 (Tan-IW), confirming that Sin-IW demonstrated a good fit for classical and Bayesian inference. These results highlight the robustness of the Sin-G family among trigonometric distributions and offer practical insights for selecting appropriate models when analyzing data with diverse distributional features.

DataVol. 11(7)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Miami University (US), Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.