Single-surgeon Transition From Laparoscopy to Robotic-assisted Bariatric and General Surgery: Throughput, Operative Times, and Learning-curve Trajectory Across 1664 Consecutive Cases

Background: The operational impact of transitioning from laparoscopic to robotic surgery is incompletely characterized, particularly regarding throughput and nonconsole operative time. Methods: We analyzed 1664 consecutive cases performed by a single surgeon (2023-2026), comparing laparoscopic (n=632) and robotic eras (n=1032). Throughput, operative time, and robotic OR overhead (skin-to-skin minus console time) were assessed using EMR, MBSAQIP, and vendor-derived data sources. Results: Weekly case volume increased from 9.54 to 11.36 (+19.1%), with stable OR days and increased cases per OR day (+17%). Robotic cases had longer operative times (SG +14.0 min; RYGB +27.6 min, P <0.001). The mean robotic OR overhead was ~19 minutes and consistent across independent data sources. Over time, overhead decreased by 30% (23.2 to 16.3 min; P <0.001), demonstrating improved efficiency. Conclusions: Transition to robotic surgery increased throughput despite longer operative times. Robotic OR overhead is substantial but declines with experience, suggesting recoverable efficiency gains over time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000001492
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-surgeon Transition From Laparoscopy to Robotic-assisted Bariatric and General Surgery: Throughput, Operative Times, and Learning-curve Trajectory Across 1664 Consecutive Cases

Benjamin Clapp
Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Single-surgeon Transition From Laparoscopy to Robotic-assisted Bariatric and General Surgery: Throughput, Operative Times, and Learning-curve Trajectory Across 1664 Consecutive Cases

Benjamin Clapp
article en

Abstract

Background: The operational impact of transitioning from laparoscopic to robotic surgery is incompletely characterized, particularly regarding throughput and nonconsole operative time. Methods: We analyzed 1664 consecutive cases performed by a single surgeon (2023-2026), comparing laparoscopic (n=632) and robotic eras (n=1032). Throughput, operative time, and robotic OR overhead (skin-to-skin minus console time) were assessed using EMR, MBSAQIP, and vendor-derived data sources. Results: Weekly case volume increased from 9.54 to 11.36 (+19.1%), with stable OR days and increased cases per OR day (+17%). Robotic cases had longer operative times (SG +14.0 min; RYGB +27.6 min, P <0.001). The mean robotic OR overhead was ~19 minutes and consistent across independent data sources. Over time, overhead decreased by 30% (23.2 to 16.3 min; P <0.001), demonstrating improved efficiency. Conclusions: Transition to robotic surgery increased throughput despite longer operative times. Robotic OR overhead is substantial but declines with experience, suggesting recoverable efficiency gains over time.

Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.