Development of a novel progressive maximal punch test to evaluate sport-specific endurance capacity in kickboxing athletes: reliability and discriminant validity

Abstract Purpose Although there is a test to measure kickboxing-specific anaerobic power, there is no valid and reliable test to specifically evaluate the upper-body endurance capacity of kickboxers. In the present study, we determine the test–retest reliability and discriminant validity of a novel Kickboxing Progressive Maximal Punch Test (KPMPT). Methods Eighteen Elite (28.7 ± 5.4 years, 72.5 ± 9.3 kg, and 1.70 ± 0.08 m) and 14 Trained (26.7 ± 5.7 years, 72.8 ± 9.3 kg, and 1.69 ± 0.08 m) kickboxers performed two KPMPT on different days. The KPMPT consisted of executing successive strokes, in which one stroke corresponded to two punches (jab and straight punch). The KPMPT started at 30 strokes.min −1 (i.e., 60 punches.min −1 ) and increased 1 stroke.min −1 (i.e., 2 punches.min −1 ) until exhaustion. Results Test–retest reliability scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, typical error of measurement, standard error of measurement, smallest worthwhile change, minimal detectable change, and coefficient of variation) ranged from good to excellent for time to exhaustion, maximum heart rate, and percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for time to exhaustion was considered excellent (0.982, p < 0.001), with an optimal cutoff point identified at 645 s, a sensitivity of 89%, and a specificity of 100% to discriminate the Elite from the Trained group. Trained athletes also presented higher coefficients and intercepts for the logarithm adjustment of the heart rate-time curve than Elite athletes ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The KPMPT identifies similar results on different days and detects differences in upper-body endurance capacity between Elite and Trained kickboxers. Thus, the KPMPT seems to be a simple, reliable, and valid test for evaluating the upper-body endurance capacity of kickboxers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-026-01869-5
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a novel progressive maximal punch test to evaluate sport-specific endurance capacity in kickboxing athletes: reliability and discriminant validity

Jean Carlos Calabrese, Jonatan de Oliveira, Adriano E. Lima-Silva, Andre Rodacki et al.
Sport Sciences for Health
Sports Performance and Training
article

Development of a novel progressive maximal punch test to evaluate sport-specific endurance capacity in kickboxing athletes: reliability and discriminant validity

Jean Carlos Calabrese, Jonatan de Oliveira, Adriano E. Lima-Silva, Andre Rodacki, Rômulo Bertuzzi, Renata G. Silva, João P. Lopes-Silva, Jaqueline A. Cardoso
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Although there is a test to measure kickboxing-specific anaerobic power, there is no valid and reliable test to specifically evaluate the upper-body endurance capacity of kickboxers. In the present study, we determine the test–retest reliability and discriminant validity of a novel Kickboxing Progressive Maximal Punch Test (KPMPT). Methods Eighteen Elite (28.7 ± 5.4 years, 72.5 ± 9.3 kg, and 1.70 ± 0.08 m) and 14 Trained (26.7 ± 5.7 years, 72.8 ± 9.3 kg, and 1.69 ± 0.08 m) kickboxers performed two KPMPT on different days. The KPMPT consisted of executing successive strokes, in which one stroke corresponded to two punches (jab and straight punch). The KPMPT started at 30 strokes.min −1 (i.e., 60 punches.min −1 ) and increased 1 stroke.min −1 (i.e., 2 punches.min −1 ) until exhaustion. Results Test–retest reliability scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, typical error of measurement, standard error of measurement, smallest worthwhile change, minimal detectable change, and coefficient of variation) ranged from good to excellent for time to exhaustion, maximum heart rate, and percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for time to exhaustion was considered excellent (0.982, p < 0.001), with an optimal cutoff point identified at 645 s, a sensitivity of 89%, and a specificity of 100% to discriminate the Elite from the Trained group. Trained athletes also presented higher coefficients and intercepts for the logarithm adjustment of the heart rate-time curve than Elite athletes ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The KPMPT identifies similar results on different days and detects differences in upper-body endurance capacity between Elite and Trained kickboxers. Thus, the KPMPT seems to be a simple, reliable, and valid test for evaluating the upper-body endurance capacity of kickboxers.

Sport Sciences for HealthVol. 22(3)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos (BR), Centro Universitário Cesmac (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.