#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention

Abstract Background #KindnessbyPost (KbP) is a “national kindness exchange”. Participants send and receive a card by post to different, unknown people containing messages of good will. Previous evidence suggests participation in KbP may reduce loneliness and improve wellbeing. We evaluated the outcomes and administrative costs of KbP and explored the feasibility of collecting health economic measures for future research. Methods We used a pre-post, observational study design. Participants in two separate KbP exchanges in 2021 were invited to complete an online questionnaire. It included self-reported measures quantifying psychological wellbeing and loneliness, capability, and healthcare service use. Data were collected at three time-points per exchange: exchange-start (baseline), exchange-end (2 weeks), and 3 months post-exchange. Administrative cost data were obtained from the KbP programme organisers. Results Across both exchanges, 1,285 responses were received from 1,142 participants. 143 participants completed questionnaires at both exchanges. In total, 623 (48%) participants completed follow-ups at exchange-end, and 414 (32%) at 3 months post-exchange. 70% (n = 789) of participants were aged between 31 and 60 years. 94% (n = 1,075) of participants were female and 95% (n = 1,078) were of white ethnicity. Compared to baseline, loneliness reduced and wellbeing increased at exchange end (change in loneliness = ‑0.21 units, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.12; change in wellbeing = 0.68 units, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88, respectively) and at 3 months post-exchange (loneliness change = -0.40 units, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.30; wellbeing change = 1.01 units, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.25, respectively). Capability scores (mean (SD) were calculated at baseline: 0.74 (0.18); exchange-end: 0.75 (0.19); and 3 months: 0.76 (0.18)) from available responses. The average administrative cost of delivering the intervention was £0.67-£0.87 per participant, not including in-kind contributions. Conclusions We observed a small, sustained improvement to people’s wellbeing and loneliness following participation in a KbP exchange. Given the study design, causal attribution to KbP is uncertain. However, our results are consistent with previous evaluations and offer preliminary evidence that KbP may be an effective mental wellbeing intervention. Given its low administrative cost and highly scalable design, KbP could also be a cost-effective intervention for improving public mental health, warranting definitive evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in future. Our study also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting wellbeing and health economic outcome measures needed for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28170-x
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention

Marie Le Novere, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Luke Sheridan Rains, Caroline S. Clarke et al.
BMC Public Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention

Marie Le Novere, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Luke Sheridan Rains, Caroline S. Clarke, Katey Warran, Rebecca Jones
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background #KindnessbyPost (KbP) is a “national kindness exchange”. Participants send and receive a card by post to different, unknown people containing messages of good will. Previous evidence suggests participation in KbP may reduce loneliness and improve wellbeing. We evaluated the outcomes and administrative costs of KbP and explored the feasibility of collecting health economic measures for future research. Methods We used a pre-post, observational study design. Participants in two separate KbP exchanges in 2021 were invited to complete an online questionnaire. It included self-reported measures quantifying psychological wellbeing and loneliness, capability, and healthcare service use. Data were collected at three time-points per exchange: exchange-start (baseline), exchange-end (2 weeks), and 3 months post-exchange. Administrative cost data were obtained from the KbP programme organisers. Results Across both exchanges, 1,285 responses were received from 1,142 participants. 143 participants completed questionnaires at both exchanges. In total, 623 (48%) participants completed follow-ups at exchange-end, and 414 (32%) at 3 months post-exchange. 70% (n = 789) of participants were aged between 31 and 60 years. 94% (n = 1,075) of participants were female and 95% (n = 1,078) were of white ethnicity. Compared to baseline, loneliness reduced and wellbeing increased at exchange end (change in loneliness = ‑0.21 units, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.12; change in wellbeing = 0.68 units, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88, respectively) and at 3 months post-exchange (loneliness change = -0.40 units, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.30; wellbeing change = 1.01 units, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.25, respectively). Capability scores (mean (SD) were calculated at baseline: 0.74 (0.18); exchange-end: 0.75 (0.19); and 3 months: 0.76 (0.18)) from available responses. The average administrative cost of delivering the intervention was £0.67-£0.87 per participant, not including in-kind contributions. Conclusions We observed a small, sustained improvement to people’s wellbeing and loneliness following participation in a KbP exchange. Given the study design, causal attribution to KbP is uncertain. However, our results are consistent with previous evaluations and offer preliminary evidence that KbP may be an effective mental wellbeing intervention. Given its low administrative cost and highly scalable design, KbP could also be a cost-effective intervention for improving public mental health, warranting definitive evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in future. Our study also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting wellbeing and health economic outcome measures needed for future research.

BMC Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.