Bridge approach settlement control using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported embankments

The paper describes a case of using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments to control the differential settlement of bridge approaches. The results showed when the embankment height increased to 2.4 times the clear pile spacing, the soil arching effect fully developed. When the pile spacing increased from 2.5 m to 3 m, the weakening of the soil arching effect led to a 20% increase in the maximum subsoil displacement. Next, the influence of moving vehicle loads on the soil arch was studied using a three-dimensional finite element model of GRPS embankments. The study found that under moving vehicle load, the maximum vertical displacement at the bottom of the embankment increased by 6% to 9% compared with the static load. The maximum tensile force of the geogrid increased by 18% to 26% compared with the static load. Lastly, the influence of dynamic load parameters on the soil arching effect of GRPS embankments was analyzed. The results showed that changing from the half-sine load type to the sine load type increased the maximum vertical stress at the bottom of the embankment by 6%. The study also found that the vehicle wheel load was the most sensitive to the influence of geogrid tension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosynthetics International
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.25.00232
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridge approach settlement control using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported embankments

Li J, Y. Zhuang, C. Peng, L.-F. Xu
Geosynthetics International
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Bridge approach settlement control using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported embankments

Li J, Y. Zhuang, C. Peng, L.-F. Xu
article en

Abstract

The paper describes a case of using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments to control the differential settlement of bridge approaches. The results showed when the embankment height increased to 2.4 times the clear pile spacing, the soil arching effect fully developed. When the pile spacing increased from 2.5 m to 3 m, the weakening of the soil arching effect led to a 20% increase in the maximum subsoil displacement. Next, the influence of moving vehicle loads on the soil arch was studied using a three-dimensional finite element model of GRPS embankments. The study found that under moving vehicle load, the maximum vertical displacement at the bottom of the embankment increased by 6% to 9% compared with the static load. The maximum tensile force of the geogrid increased by 18% to 26% compared with the static load. Lastly, the influence of dynamic load parameters on the soil arching effect of GRPS embankments was analyzed. The results showed that changing from the half-sine load type to the sine load type increased the maximum vertical stress at the bottom of the embankment by 6%. The study also found that the vehicle wheel load was the most sensitive to the influence of geogrid tension.

Geosynthetics International
East China Jiaotong University (CN), Southeast University (BD), Ministry of Education (RO), Ministry of Education (CL), Southeast University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridge approach settlement control using geogrid-reinforced pile-supported embankments — Li J, Y. Zhuang, et al. · Geosynthetics International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS