Radiometric Intercalibration Methodologies for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery in Precision Agriculture

Abstract. This paper examines how to align PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 vegetation indices, focusing on the Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) index, which is commonly used in precision agriculture for prescription maps. While Sentinel-2 is popular for crop monitoring, its low spatial resolution limits use in small or irregular fields. PlanetScope provides higher-resolution, more frequent imagery, but its sensor differs from the Sentinel-2, limiting compatibility with current research and tools. By testing three adjustment methods, the study shows that it is possible to align PlanetScope NDRE values with Sentinel-2: M1 (Linear Regression + Histogram Shifting + Histogram Matching), M2 (Histogram Matching), and M3 (per-band linear regression before index calculation). Two dates from 2022 were selected as representative seasonal extremes from the broader 2021–2023 dataset of 56 image pairs (Baldin, 2025), which was further analyzed through time-series methods. Resampling direction (PS→10 m, S2→3 m) minimally affects RMSE/MAE but significantly alters spatial structure and Moran’s I values; downscaling PS to 10 m decreases Moran’s I. M2 is suitable for standard applications, whereas M3 is preferable when preservation of spatial structure is important. Across the four examined scenarios, all methods reduce RMSE below the 0.07 agronomic threshold, with calibrated RMSE ranging from 0.02 to 0.05 (up to 0.06 across the full 56-pair dataset). M3’s advantage lies in how effectively it reduces spatial autocorrelation mismatch: a 43.4% reduction in Moran’s I (versus ~18.2% with M1 and M2) in the four example scenarios, and 39.5% versus 28.4% (M1) and 28.2% (M2) reduction over the full dataset.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b1-2026-231-2026
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiometric Intercalibration Methodologies for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery in Precision Agriculture

Vittorio Casella, Christian Massimiliano Baldin
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Radiometric Intercalibration Methodologies for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery in Precision Agriculture

Vittorio Casella, Christian Massimiliano Baldin
article en

Abstract

Abstract. This paper examines how to align PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 vegetation indices, focusing on the Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) index, which is commonly used in precision agriculture for prescription maps. While Sentinel-2 is popular for crop monitoring, its low spatial resolution limits use in small or irregular fields. PlanetScope provides higher-resolution, more frequent imagery, but its sensor differs from the Sentinel-2, limiting compatibility with current research and tools. By testing three adjustment methods, the study shows that it is possible to align PlanetScope NDRE values with Sentinel-2: M1 (Linear Regression + Histogram Shifting + Histogram Matching), M2 (Histogram Matching), and M3 (per-band linear regression before index calculation). Two dates from 2022 were selected as representative seasonal extremes from the broader 2021–2023 dataset of 56 image pairs (Baldin, 2025), which was further analyzed through time-series methods. Resampling direction (PS→10 m, S2→3 m) minimally affects RMSE/MAE but significantly alters spatial structure and Moran’s I values; downscaling PS to 10 m decreases Moran’s I. M2 is suitable for standard applications, whereas M3 is preferable when preservation of spatial structure is important. Across the four examined scenarios, all methods reduce RMSE below the 0.07 agronomic threshold, with calibrated RMSE ranging from 0.02 to 0.05 (up to 0.06 across the full 56-pair dataset). M3’s advantage lies in how effectively it reduces spatial autocorrelation mismatch: a 43.4% reduction in Moran’s I (versus ~18.2% with M1 and M2) in the four example scenarios, and 39.5% versus 28.4% (M1) and 28.2% (M2) reduction over the full dataset.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B1-2026
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.