Does language prestige hypothesis hold true across typologically distant languages? A corpus-based study comparing shining-through effect in English-Chinese bidirectional translations

While the influence of language prestige on the source language shining through has been well-documented in studies involving typologically similar languages, its impact on typologically distant language pairs remains underexplored. This article examines the interplay between language prestige and typological differences in shaping the shining-through effect, extending the analysis to Chinese-English bidirectional translations. Based on a bidirectional parallel balanced corpus, the study compares the shining-through effect in both Chinese-to-English and English-to-Chinese translations through the application of principal component analysis and flexible discriminant analysis. The findings revealed that the shining-through effect was present in both translation directions but was more pronounced in English-to-Chinese translations. Additionally, the effect varied across registers, with imaginative texts showing a stronger tendency than the informative texts. These results provide further evidence supporting the hypotheses of language prestige, typological distance and risk aversion. A comparison with findings from studies involving typologically closer language pairs further suggests that typological distance may help explain variation in the influence of language prestige on source language shining through. Specifically, the prestige effect appears to be weaker when the source and target languages are typologically more distant, although this interpretation requires direct empirical testing in future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353687
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does language prestige hypothesis hold true across typologically distant languages? A corpus-based study comparing shining-through effect in English-Chinese bidirectional translations

Jia Li, Yunhao Pan
PLoS ONE
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Does language prestige hypothesis hold true across typologically distant languages? A corpus-based study comparing shining-through effect in English-Chinese bidirectional translations

Jia Li, Yunhao Pan
article en

Abstract

While the influence of language prestige on the source language shining through has been well-documented in studies involving typologically similar languages, its impact on typologically distant language pairs remains underexplored. This article examines the interplay between language prestige and typological differences in shaping the shining-through effect, extending the analysis to Chinese-English bidirectional translations. Based on a bidirectional parallel balanced corpus, the study compares the shining-through effect in both Chinese-to-English and English-to-Chinese translations through the application of principal component analysis and flexible discriminant analysis. The findings revealed that the shining-through effect was present in both translation directions but was more pronounced in English-to-Chinese translations. Additionally, the effect varied across registers, with imaginative texts showing a stronger tendency than the informative texts. These results provide further evidence supporting the hypotheses of language prestige, typological distance and risk aversion. A comparison with findings from studies involving typologically closer language pairs further suggests that typological distance may help explain variation in the influence of language prestige on source language shining through. Specifically, the prestige effect appears to be weaker when the source and target languages are typologically more distant, although this interpretation requires direct empirical testing in future research.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.