The Early Husserl on Concepts: From Bolzano to Kant?

Abstract This paper examines the shift from (late) modern to contemporary philosophy by examining Husserl’s early account of concepts. Given Husserl’s ambiguous allegiance in this transition, his treatment of concepts provides a privileged vantage point for understanding both his philosophy and his role in the shift toward contemporary philosophy. This paper argues that Husserl’s early view of concept (1896–1903) was strongly shaped by a Bolzanian, logical-objectivist framework, which he later reassessed in light of further developments. Against Ursula Neemann’s influential claim that Husserl ultimately broke with Bolzano in favor of a Kantian position, this study contends however that he neither abandoned core Bolzanian tenets nor returned to Kant. Rather, his reassessment arose from internal phenomenological concerns. The paper outlines Husserl’s early treatment of concepts. It recognizes Husserl’s indebtedness to and partial divergence from Bolzano. I reject Neemann’s thesis, while I highlight ontological and epistemological advances that made Husserl diverge from Bolzano.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transcendental Philosophy
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2026-0005
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Early Husserl on Concepts: From Bolzano to Kant?

Victor Portugal
Journal of Transcendental Philosophy
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

The Early Husserl on Concepts: From Bolzano to Kant?

Victor Portugal
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the shift from (late) modern to contemporary philosophy by examining Husserl’s early account of concepts. Given Husserl’s ambiguous allegiance in this transition, his treatment of concepts provides a privileged vantage point for understanding both his philosophy and his role in the shift toward contemporary philosophy. This paper argues that Husserl’s early view of concept (1896–1903) was strongly shaped by a Bolzanian, logical-objectivist framework, which he later reassessed in light of further developments. Against Ursula Neemann’s influential claim that Husserl ultimately broke with Bolzano in favor of a Kantian position, this study contends however that he neither abandoned core Bolzanian tenets nor returned to Kant. Rather, his reassessment arose from internal phenomenological concerns. The paper outlines Husserl’s early treatment of concepts. It recognizes Husserl’s indebtedness to and partial divergence from Bolzano. I reject Neemann’s thesis, while I highlight ontological and epistemological advances that made Husserl diverge from Bolzano.

Journal of Transcendental Philosophy
University of Freiburg (DE), Institute of Philosophy (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Early Husserl on Concepts: From Bolzano to Kant? — Victor Portugal · Journal of Transcendental Philosophy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS