Emotional Elasticity: A Temporal-Contextual Framework for Adaptive Affective Change

Human adaptation depends not only on which emotions individuals experience or whether they recover from adversity, but also on how emotional states change as externally occurring circumstances and their subjective meaning evolve. This conceptual paper proposes emotional elasticity as a temporal-contextual framework for adaptive affective change. The framework distinguishes external or intersubjectively indexable context from appraisal, emotion, regulation, feedback, and functioning in order to reduce circularity in the study of contextual coupling. Emotional elasticity is defined as the capacity of an emotional system to register personally significant events, undergo proportionate affective alteration, and update its organization in response to contextual change and regulatory feedback without becoming either excessively resistant to necessary change or disproportionately unstable. The model is not committed in advance to a single psychometric architecture: reflective latent, causal or composite, multidimensional-profile, and dynamic-process representations are treated as competing empirical possibilities. Four recurrent processes are identified: context registration and appraisal, affective displacement, regulatory reorganization, and feedback-based outcome evaluation. Their adaptive relation is conceptualized as a moving surface dependent on person, emotion, context, and timescale rather than as a universal midpoint or simple quadratic optimum. Longitudinal outcomes may involve restoration, recalibration, or transformation, operationally distinguished through affective, functional, temporal, and identity-related criteria. Integrative self-continuity is treated as a related moderator or outcome following identity-relevant transformation. A preregisterable validation programme is proposed using multi-source ecological momentary assessment, independent event coding, person-specific modelling, out-of-sample prediction, and narrative analysis. Emotional elasticity remains a falsifiable research framework rather than an established trait, scale, or clinical instrument.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21492808
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Emotional Elasticity: A Temporal-Contextual Framework for Adaptive Affective Change

Narcis Somesfalean
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mental Health Research Topics
preprint

Emotional Elasticity: A Temporal-Contextual Framework for Adaptive Affective Change

Narcis Somesfalean
preprint en

Abstract

Human adaptation depends not only on which emotions individuals experience or whether they recover from adversity, but also on how emotional states change as externally occurring circumstances and their subjective meaning evolve. This conceptual paper proposes emotional elasticity as a temporal-contextual framework for adaptive affective change. The framework distinguishes external or intersubjectively indexable context from appraisal, emotion, regulation, feedback, and functioning in order to reduce circularity in the study of contextual coupling. Emotional elasticity is defined as the capacity of an emotional system to register personally significant events, undergo proportionate affective alteration, and update its organization in response to contextual change and regulatory feedback without becoming either excessively resistant to necessary change or disproportionately unstable. The model is not committed in advance to a single psychometric architecture: reflective latent, causal or composite, multidimensional-profile, and dynamic-process representations are treated as competing empirical possibilities. Four recurrent processes are identified: context registration and appraisal, affective displacement, regulatory reorganization, and feedback-based outcome evaluation. Their adaptive relation is conceptualized as a moving surface dependent on person, emotion, context, and timescale rather than as a universal midpoint or simple quadratic optimum. Longitudinal outcomes may involve restoration, recalibration, or transformation, operationally distinguished through affective, functional, temporal, and identity-related criteria. Integrative self-continuity is treated as a related moderator or outcome following identity-relevant transformation. A preregisterable validation programme is proposed using multi-source ecological momentary assessment, independent event coding, person-specific modelling, out-of-sample prediction, and narrative analysis. Emotional elasticity remains a falsifiable research framework rather than an established trait, scale, or clinical instrument.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.