Linking mantle plume contributions to magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposit formation

The contributions of mantle plumes to the formation of magmatic nickel–copper–platinum-group element sulfide deposits remain poorly characterized. Here, we assess this ambiguity by utilizing the Hg isotope composition of sulfide ores from the giant Jinchuan deposit and those within the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, which represent magmatic sulfide deposits that formed within intracratonic and orogenic settings, respectively. The Δ199Hg values of the sulfide ores within the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (0.01 ± 0.16‰, 2 SD) and Jinchuan (−0.03 ± 0.11‰, 2 SD) are similar to those of mantle plumes (0.0 ± 0.1‰, 2 SD), but distinctly different from those of metasomatized lithospheric mantle (non-zero). This supports a plume origin for magmatic sulfide deposit formation, regardless of their formation in intracratonic or orogenic settings. These findings help to better understand the genesis of magmatic sulfide deposits in a diversity of tectonic settings and provide new insights into Hg isotope behavior during magmatic sulfide mineralization. Δ199Hg values in Central Asian Orogenic Belt and Jinchuan sulfide ores match mantle plume signatures and differ from metasomatized lithospheric mantle, indicating a mantle plume origin for these deposits, according to Hg isotope analysis of the Ni–Cu PGE ore samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03821-4
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Linking mantle plume contributions to magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposit formation

Abulimiti Aibai, Xiao‐Hua Deng, Yanjing Chen, Ping Li et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Linking mantle plume contributions to magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposit formation

Abulimiti Aibai, Xiao‐Hua Deng, Yanjing Chen, Ping Li, Y N Wu, Run-sheng YIN, Matthew J. Brzozowski
article en

Abstract

The contributions of mantle plumes to the formation of magmatic nickel–copper–platinum-group element sulfide deposits remain poorly characterized. Here, we assess this ambiguity by utilizing the Hg isotope composition of sulfide ores from the giant Jinchuan deposit and those within the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, which represent magmatic sulfide deposits that formed within intracratonic and orogenic settings, respectively. The Δ199Hg values of the sulfide ores within the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (0.01 ± 0.16‰, 2 SD) and Jinchuan (−0.03 ± 0.11‰, 2 SD) are similar to those of mantle plumes (0.0 ± 0.1‰, 2 SD), but distinctly different from those of metasomatized lithospheric mantle (non-zero). This supports a plume origin for magmatic sulfide deposit formation, regardless of their formation in intracratonic or orogenic settings. These findings help to better understand the genesis of magmatic sulfide deposits in a diversity of tectonic settings and provide new insights into Hg isotope behavior during magmatic sulfide mineralization. Δ199Hg values in Central Asian Orogenic Belt and Jinchuan sulfide ores match mantle plume signatures and differ from metasomatized lithospheric mantle, indicating a mantle plume origin for these deposits, according to Hg isotope analysis of the Ni–Cu PGE ore samples.

Communications Earth & Environment
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Institute of Ecology and Geography (MD), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), Xinjiang Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (CN), Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Xinjiang Academy of Forestry (CN), Institute of Geochemistry (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.