Converting artificial intelligence into national capability: A three-layer framework for comparative strategy

Artificial intelligence is increasingly treated as a strategic technology, but innovation or regulation alone does not produce national power. This article develops a realist, state-centered framework for analyzing how states convert distributed artificial-intelligence capacity into strategic power. It argues that conversion occurs across three interdependent layers: Invention, Industrialization, and Operationalization, with governance structuring access, coordination, constraint, legitimacy, and control across them. Governance is treated as a cross-layer conversion mechanism rather than as a separate layer or as a synonym for AI regulation. Such conversion governance can enable capability conversion, but it can also delay, fragment, constrain, or fail to connect with infrastructure and operational use. Through a structured comparison of the United States and China as sovereign state-centered configurations, and the European Union as a regulatory-market configuration, the article assesses how state authority, strategic-firm capacity, regulatory power and infrastructural dependence combine differently to produce, limit or mediate national capability today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2702077
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Converting artificial intelligence into national capability: A three-layer framework for comparative strategy

Anastasios (Tasos) Tassos
Comparative Strategy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Converting artificial intelligence into national capability: A three-layer framework for comparative strategy

Anastasios (Tasos) Tassos
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly treated as a strategic technology, but innovation or regulation alone does not produce national power. This article develops a realist, state-centered framework for analyzing how states convert distributed artificial-intelligence capacity into strategic power. It argues that conversion occurs across three interdependent layers: Invention, Industrialization, and Operationalization, with governance structuring access, coordination, constraint, legitimacy, and control across them. Governance is treated as a cross-layer conversion mechanism rather than as a separate layer or as a synonym for AI regulation. Such conversion governance can enable capability conversion, but it can also delay, fragment, constrain, or fail to connect with infrastructure and operational use. Through a structured comparison of the United States and China as sovereign state-centered configurations, and the European Union as a regulatory-market configuration, the article assesses how state authority, strategic-firm capacity, regulatory power and infrastructural dependence combine differently to produce, limit or mediate national capability today.

Comparative Strategy
Panteion University (GR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.