“Don’t Know, Don’t Care?” How information and institutional reform affect voting in supranational elections: experimental evidence from the 2024 European Parliamentary elections

Abstract European elections consistently show lower turnout compared to national elections. Two types of explanations have been proposed. The first is the “don’t know” explanation: European citizens are not adequately informed about what the EU does, what the role of the European Parliament (EP) is, and what impact their vote can have. The second explanation is that they “don’t care”: voters do not care about European elections because they might think that EU policies do not affect them or that the European Parliament is not an important actor in EU politics. I use a between-subject survey experiment in 16 EU countries, with approximately 30,000 respondents, one month before the 2024 European elections, with a follow-up in the days after the vote, to see whether giving voters more information about what the European Parliament does and presenting respondents with hypothetical increases in the powers of the European Parliament, affects their intention to vote and eventual real-world vote. Results show that information increases likelihood to vote. Importantly, these effects last and increase actual voting propensity a month later. Surprisingly, hypothetical increases in the powers of the EP decrease the likelihood to vote among almost all groups of respondents. Among respondents that are skeptical of the EU or perceive a democratic deficit, this negative effect is more pronounced. Even among pro-EU respondents and among those that prefer to see a stronger role for the Commission, the backlash is strong. When considering increasing the powers of the EP, the European Union has little to gain and much to lose when it comes to civic participation. The EU needs to first improve its legitimacy before considering political reforms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773926100587
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Don’t Know, Don’t Care?” How information and institutional reform affect voting in supranational elections: experimental evidence from the 2024 European Parliamentary elections

Alexandru D Moise
European Political Science Review
European Union Policy and Governance
article

“Don’t Know, Don’t Care?” How information and institutional reform affect voting in supranational elections: experimental evidence from the 2024 European Parliamentary elections

Alexandru D Moise
article en

Abstract

Abstract European elections consistently show lower turnout compared to national elections. Two types of explanations have been proposed. The first is the “don’t know” explanation: European citizens are not adequately informed about what the EU does, what the role of the European Parliament (EP) is, and what impact their vote can have. The second explanation is that they “don’t care”: voters do not care about European elections because they might think that EU policies do not affect them or that the European Parliament is not an important actor in EU politics. I use a between-subject survey experiment in 16 EU countries, with approximately 30,000 respondents, one month before the 2024 European elections, with a follow-up in the days after the vote, to see whether giving voters more information about what the European Parliament does and presenting respondents with hypothetical increases in the powers of the European Parliament, affects their intention to vote and eventual real-world vote. Results show that information increases likelihood to vote. Importantly, these effects last and increase actual voting propensity a month later. Surprisingly, hypothetical increases in the powers of the EP decrease the likelihood to vote among almost all groups of respondents. Among respondents that are skeptical of the EU or perceive a democratic deficit, this negative effect is more pronounced. Even among pro-EU respondents and among those that prefer to see a stronger role for the Commission, the backlash is strong. When considering increasing the powers of the EP, the European Union has little to gain and much to lose when it comes to civic participation. The EU needs to first improve its legitimacy before considering political reforms.

European Political Science Review
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.