Metrological evaluation of non-destructive testing methods for post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridges

Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are widely used to assess the condition of prestressed concrete bridges, although their real effectiveness is still subject to uncertainty and requires experimental validation. This study evaluates three NDT techniques commonly applied to post-tensioning systems: digital radiography, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and reflection impulse measurement test (RIMT). The investigation is carried out on the Alveo Vecchio viaduct, a decommissioned post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridge representative of construction practices from the 1960s. All inspections were performed by trained operators from specialised NDT service providers, who also interpreted the results according to their best professional practice, focusing on grout injection defects and prestressing steel corrosion. Following the NDT campaign, the bridge is subjected to controlled dissection, allowing direct observation of the actual defect conditions. The predictions obtained from each technique were compared with the observed defects, and their correlation is quantified using statistical analysis tools. The results indicate that DR is the only technique that shows appreciable effectiveness in detecting grout injection voids. In contrast, RIMT exhibits a poor correlation with grout defects. Furthermore, both GPR and RIMT demonstrate limited capability in identifying corrosion of prestressing steel, highlighting significant limitations in current NDT approaches for reliable condition assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2026.2701429
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metrological evaluation of non-destructive testing methods for post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridges

Daniele Zonta, Enrico Tubaldi, Francesco Rossi, Stefano Zorzi
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Metrological evaluation of non-destructive testing methods for post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridges

Daniele Zonta, Enrico Tubaldi, Francesco Rossi, Stefano Zorzi
article en

Abstract

Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are widely used to assess the condition of prestressed concrete bridges, although their real effectiveness is still subject to uncertainty and requires experimental validation. This study evaluates three NDT techniques commonly applied to post-tensioning systems: digital radiography, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and reflection impulse measurement test (RIMT). The investigation is carried out on the Alveo Vecchio viaduct, a decommissioned post-tensioned reinforced concrete bridge representative of construction practices from the 1960s. All inspections were performed by trained operators from specialised NDT service providers, who also interpreted the results according to their best professional practice, focusing on grout injection defects and prestressing steel corrosion. Following the NDT campaign, the bridge is subjected to controlled dissection, allowing direct observation of the actual defect conditions. The predictions obtained from each technique were compared with the observed defects, and their correlation is quantified using statistical analysis tools. The results indicate that DR is the only technique that shows appreciable effectiveness in detecting grout injection voids. In contrast, RIMT exhibits a poor correlation with grout defects. Furthermore, both GPR and RIMT demonstrate limited capability in identifying corrosion of prestressing steel, highlighting significant limitations in current NDT approaches for reliable condition assessment.

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Trento (IT), Socotec (United Kingdom) (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.