De-Privatizing Love: A Transnational Dialogue on the Public Dimension of Love in the Socio-Political Sphere

Dominant rationalist and neoliberal frameworks have often privatized love by treating it as an intimate emotion detached from institutions, power, and collective life. This article examines when love becomes publicly consequential as a sociological force. Using an interpretive, cross-cultural, and dialogical approach, it brings into conversation three situated sociological traditions developed in Brazil, Italy, and South Korea. Rather than comparing nation-states as fixed units, the article analyses how different sociological traditions interpret shared public problems through distinct moral vocabularies and institutional contexts. Three public grammars of love emerge: struggles over inequality and ecological justice in Brazil; tensions between expertise and democratic mediation in Italy; and questions of social empathy, hyper-competition, and post-growth transformation in South Korea. Love also appears as an ambivalent force that may generate cohesion or conflict, inclusion or exclusion. The article concludes that de-privatizing love broadens sociological understanding of how emotions shape collective life and demonstrates the analytical value of dialogical engagement between sociological traditions for reconstructing the public meanings of love across different socio-political contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15070492
Primary Topic
Sociology and Norbert Elias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-Privatizing Love: A Transnational Dialogue on the Public Dimension of Love in the Socio-Political Sphere

Angélica De Sena, Woon-Taek Lim, Stefano Tomelleri, Silvia Cataldi et al.
Social Sciences
Sociology and Norbert Elias
article

De-Privatizing Love: A Transnational Dialogue on the Public Dimension of Love in the Socio-Political Sphere

Angélica De Sena, Woon-Taek Lim, Stefano Tomelleri, Silvia Cataldi, Paulo Henrique Martins, Wonho Jang, Edna Castro
article en

Abstract

Dominant rationalist and neoliberal frameworks have often privatized love by treating it as an intimate emotion detached from institutions, power, and collective life. This article examines when love becomes publicly consequential as a sociological force. Using an interpretive, cross-cultural, and dialogical approach, it brings into conversation three situated sociological traditions developed in Brazil, Italy, and South Korea. Rather than comparing nation-states as fixed units, the article analyses how different sociological traditions interpret shared public problems through distinct moral vocabularies and institutional contexts. Three public grammars of love emerge: struggles over inequality and ecological justice in Brazil; tensions between expertise and democratic mediation in Italy; and questions of social empathy, hyper-competition, and post-growth transformation in South Korea. Love also appears as an ambivalent force that may generate cohesion or conflict, inclusion or exclusion. The article concludes that de-privatizing love broadens sociological understanding of how emotions shape collective life and demonstrates the analytical value of dialogical engagement between sociological traditions for reconstructing the public meanings of love across different socio-political contexts.

Social SciencesVol. 15(7)
University of Bergamo (IT), University of Seoul (KR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud (AR), Keimyung University (KR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR), Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (AR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sociology and Norbert Elias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.