Vehicle-Based Mobile Mapping Test Platform: Direct Georeferencing and TLS-Based Accuracy Assessment

Abstract. Professional mobile mapping systems achieve centimeter-level accuracy through the tight integration of navigation-grade IMUs, survey-grade GNSS, and calibrated laser scanners. This paper assesses the relative and absolute accuracy of a vehicle-mounted test platform that combines a NovAtel SPAN tightly coupled GNSS/IMU with a mid-grade Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR, evaluated along a 1.2 km test loop on The Ohio State University campus. The mobile-cloud georeferencing is driven entirely by the SPAN-processed GNSS/IMU trajectory, post-processed in NovAtel Inertial Explorer; three additional survey-grade PPK GNSS receivers are processed independently and serve as cross-checks on the trajectory. Direct georeferencing is performed in the standard ECEF formulation with per-point trajectory interpolation. An independent reference point cloud of the same area is acquired with a Leica RTC360 terrestrial laser scanner, registered and tied down to GNSS-derived ground control so that the TLS cloud carries an independent absolute geodetic datum. Absolute accuracy is then evaluated directly: identifiable features on building façades are coordinated independently in each cloud, and the coordinate differences between the mobile-cloud and TLS positions of the same features quantify the absolute georeferencing error of the directly georeferenced mobile cloud. Relative accuracy is evaluated separately from the internal geometry of each cloud: structure dimensions, inter-feature distances, and inter-feature angles are measured in the mobile cloud and in the TLS and compared, isolating the shape-preservation performance of the platform from any constant offset between the two reference frames. An auxiliary SHARE SLAM S20 handheld scanner mounted on the same vehicle is described as supplementary platform context; its data is not used in the accuracy assessment due to unreliable GNSS/IMU/SLAM integration at vehicle speeds.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b1-2026-49-2026
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vehicle-Based Mobile Mapping Test Platform: Direct Georeferencing and TLS-Based Accuracy Assessment

Charles Toth, Barış Süleymanoğlu, Rami Tamimi, Abdelgwad Elashry
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Vehicle-Based Mobile Mapping Test Platform: Direct Georeferencing and TLS-Based Accuracy Assessment

Charles Toth, Barış Süleymanoğlu, Rami Tamimi, Abdelgwad Elashry
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Professional mobile mapping systems achieve centimeter-level accuracy through the tight integration of navigation-grade IMUs, survey-grade GNSS, and calibrated laser scanners. This paper assesses the relative and absolute accuracy of a vehicle-mounted test platform that combines a NovAtel SPAN tightly coupled GNSS/IMU with a mid-grade Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR, evaluated along a 1.2 km test loop on The Ohio State University campus. The mobile-cloud georeferencing is driven entirely by the SPAN-processed GNSS/IMU trajectory, post-processed in NovAtel Inertial Explorer; three additional survey-grade PPK GNSS receivers are processed independently and serve as cross-checks on the trajectory. Direct georeferencing is performed in the standard ECEF formulation with per-point trajectory interpolation. An independent reference point cloud of the same area is acquired with a Leica RTC360 terrestrial laser scanner, registered and tied down to GNSS-derived ground control so that the TLS cloud carries an independent absolute geodetic datum. Absolute accuracy is then evaluated directly: identifiable features on building façades are coordinated independently in each cloud, and the coordinate differences between the mobile-cloud and TLS positions of the same features quantify the absolute georeferencing error of the directly georeferenced mobile cloud. Relative accuracy is evaluated separately from the internal geometry of each cloud: structure dimensions, inter-feature distances, and inter-feature angles are measured in the mobile cloud and in the TLS and compared, isolating the shape-preservation performance of the platform from any constant offset between the two reference frames. An auxiliary SHARE SLAM S20 handheld scanner mounted on the same vehicle is described as supplementary platform context; its data is not used in the accuracy assessment due to unreliable GNSS/IMU/SLAM integration at vehicle speeds.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B1-2026
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.