Entering the Inner Core of Cabinets: Electoral Causes and Consequences of Holding Salient Ministerial Offices

ABSTRACT Can electoral success be an asset for being appointed to more prominent ministerial posts in cabinets? Are ministers punished or rewarded by voters according to the importance of their post? These questions are explored in this article. Portfolio allocation as well as electoral consequences of participating in governments is usually studied at the party level and not for individual politicians. The novel approach in this article is to focus on individual ministers rather than parties. We approach importance of ministerial posts according to membership of certain cabinet committees, which can mark a clear demarcation line of which ministers have more and less influence on cabinet policies within parties in governments. By using a dataset on Danish ministers from 1977 to 2022 we find a complex relationship between personal votes and policy influence in cabinet, providing important nuances to the existing literature on cabinet governance, ministerial selection and cost of ruling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Political Studies
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.70054
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entering the Inner Core of Cabinets: Electoral Causes and Consequences of Holding Salient Ministerial Offices

Peter Heyn Nielsen
Scandinavian Political Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Entering the Inner Core of Cabinets: Electoral Causes and Consequences of Holding Salient Ministerial Offices

Peter Heyn Nielsen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Can electoral success be an asset for being appointed to more prominent ministerial posts in cabinets? Are ministers punished or rewarded by voters according to the importance of their post? These questions are explored in this article. Portfolio allocation as well as electoral consequences of participating in governments is usually studied at the party level and not for individual politicians. The novel approach in this article is to focus on individual ministers rather than parties. We approach importance of ministerial posts according to membership of certain cabinet committees, which can mark a clear demarcation line of which ministers have more and less influence on cabinet policies within parties in governments. By using a dataset on Danish ministers from 1977 to 2022 we find a complex relationship between personal votes and policy influence in cabinet, providing important nuances to the existing literature on cabinet governance, ministerial selection and cost of ruling.

Scandinavian Political StudiesVol. 49(3)
Roskilde University (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Entering the Inner Core of Cabinets: Electoral Causes and Consequences of Holding Salient Ministerial Offices — Peter Heyn Nielsen · Scandinavian Political Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS