Factors influencing the mental health of young people with disability in Australia: a systematic scoping review

Abstract Objectives Young Australians with disability experience poorer mental health than their non-disabled peers. Despite this, there is no synthesis of the factors influencing their mental health. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review using the socio-ecological model to identify and synthesise these factors. Study design A scoping review following JBI methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Data sources Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ERIC were searched for Australian peer-reviewed empirical studies published between January 2015 and April 2026. Data synthesis Of the 2,712 publications identified, only 11 met inclusion criteria, highlighting a limited evidence base. Guided by the socio-ecological model, we identified 10 factors influencing mental health. Reported factors at the individual level included functioning in daily living activities, chronic pain, impairment type, and employment status. At the interpersonal level, factors included exposure to bullying and victimisation, sense of belonging, and relationships with teachers and peers. At the organisational level, factors related to education, including the physical design of learning spaces, and the flexibility and accommodations available for navigating the educational environment. No publications addressed community- or policy-level factors. Few included perspectives of young Australians with disability, and none reported co-design. No research was in rural and remote contexts or included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people. Conclusion Evidence on the mental health of young Australians with disability is sparse. This limits the capacity of current responses to address the broader conditions shaping mental health and wellbeing. Action is needed to shift beyond an individual focus toward coordinated, multi-level strategies that address structural drivers of mental health inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28583-8
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the mental health of young people with disability in Australia: a systematic scoping review

Marissa Shields, Stephanie Mantilla, Kanchana Ekanayake, Jodie Bailie et al.
BMC Public Health
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Factors influencing the mental health of young people with disability in Australia: a systematic scoping review

Marissa Shields, Stephanie Mantilla, Kanchana Ekanayake, Jodie Bailie, Stefanie Dimov, Zoe Aitken, Alex Sully, Noah Folpp, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Tess Bright
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Young Australians with disability experience poorer mental health than their non-disabled peers. Despite this, there is no synthesis of the factors influencing their mental health. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review using the socio-ecological model to identify and synthesise these factors. Study design A scoping review following JBI methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Data sources Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ERIC were searched for Australian peer-reviewed empirical studies published between January 2015 and April 2026. Data synthesis Of the 2,712 publications identified, only 11 met inclusion criteria, highlighting a limited evidence base. Guided by the socio-ecological model, we identified 10 factors influencing mental health. Reported factors at the individual level included functioning in daily living activities, chronic pain, impairment type, and employment status. At the interpersonal level, factors included exposure to bullying and victimisation, sense of belonging, and relationships with teachers and peers. At the organisational level, factors related to education, including the physical design of learning spaces, and the flexibility and accommodations available for navigating the educational environment. No publications addressed community- or policy-level factors. Few included perspectives of young Australians with disability, and none reported co-design. No research was in rural and remote contexts or included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people. Conclusion Evidence on the mental health of young Australians with disability is sparse. This limits the capacity of current responses to address the broader conditions shaping mental health and wellbeing. Action is needed to shift beyond an individual focus toward coordinated, multi-level strategies that address structural drivers of mental health inequities.

BMC Public Health
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Lismore Base Hospital (AU), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.