A Comparison of the Poleno Jupiter Automated Pollen Monitor with the Traditional Hirst Method

Asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis are common conditions affecting health, wellbeing, and work place productivity. Current pollen monitoring requires experienced technicians and has a lag of at least 24 h, which limits usefulness for patient management. We evaluated agreement of daily pollen concentrations from an automated real-time sampler, the Swisens Poleno Jupiter, with a traditional Hirst-type trap using technician counting over a single monitoring season in England. We used regression models to assess the impact of weather covariates on differences. Total pollen showed a strong correlation (r = 0.74) but moderate Intraclass Correlation (ICC = 0.52) between devices, due to concentrations (total and taxa level) being higher for the manual than the automated sampler. For individual pollen taxa, strong correlation and good agreement was observed for Pinus, Alnus and Fraxinus throughout the monitoring period. Strong correlation but low/moderate agreement was observed for Poaceae (grass), Betula, Quercus and Taxus/Cupressus. No correlation or agreement was observed for Corylus and Platanus. Temperature explained most of the variability between samplers. We conclude that daily total pollen can be tracked using an automated Poleno, as can grass within its flowering season, but Poleno recognition algorithms developed for mainland Europe need further refinements for UK species. Improving agreement in quantification is of particular importance given that current allergenic thresholds are based on manual readings.