Perception and utilization of artificial intelligence in healthcare research among professionals in India: a cross-sectional study

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare research by improving data analysis, efficiency, and evidence-based decision-making. However, its practical utilization among healthcare professionals remains inconsistent, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. To assess healthcare professionals’ perception and utilization of AI in healthcare research and examine their relationship and associated factors. A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 160 healthcare professionals from nursing, medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy institutes in Bhubaneswar, India. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using structured and validated questionnaires assessing perception and utilization of AI in research. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analyses. Most participants demonstrated a neutral perception toward AI (73.8%), while 26.3% reported a positive perception (mean: 59.62 ± 8.82). Utilization was predominantly moderate (50%), followed by low (44.4%) and high (5.6%) levels (mean: 41.03 ± 14.38). AI tools were mainly used for writing, grammar correction, and literature search, whereas advanced analytical applications were less frequently utilized. Significant differences in perception and utilization were observed across professional groups. A moderate positive correlation was identified between perception and utilization ( r = 0.463, p = 0.001). Regression analysis showed that perception significantly predicted utilization (R² = 0.220, p = 0.001), while designation ( p = 0.021), research experience ( p = 0.007), and area of specialization ( p = 0.006) significantly influenced utilization. Relative Importance Index analysis indicated higher use of AI for automation tasks and lower use in methodology design and data interpretation. Healthcare professionals demonstrated moderate perception but limited utilization of AI in research. Strengthening AI-focused training, improving access to advanced AI tools, and enhancing institutional support may facilitate effective AI integration into healthcare research and improve evidence-based practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63456-5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception and utilization of artificial intelligence in healthcare research among professionals in India: a cross-sectional study

Sneha Ganguly, Nageshwar Venkatesh Reddy, N. Siva, Sasmita Das
Scientific Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Perception and utilization of artificial intelligence in healthcare research among professionals in India: a cross-sectional study

Sneha Ganguly, Nageshwar Venkatesh Reddy, N. Siva, Sasmita Das
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare research by improving data analysis, efficiency, and evidence-based decision-making. However, its practical utilization among healthcare professionals remains inconsistent, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. To assess healthcare professionals’ perception and utilization of AI in healthcare research and examine their relationship and associated factors. A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 160 healthcare professionals from nursing, medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy institutes in Bhubaneswar, India. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using structured and validated questionnaires assessing perception and utilization of AI in research. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analyses. Most participants demonstrated a neutral perception toward AI (73.8%), while 26.3% reported a positive perception (mean: 59.62 ± 8.82). Utilization was predominantly moderate (50%), followed by low (44.4%) and high (5.6%) levels (mean: 41.03 ± 14.38). AI tools were mainly used for writing, grammar correction, and literature search, whereas advanced analytical applications were less frequently utilized. Significant differences in perception and utilization were observed across professional groups. A moderate positive correlation was identified between perception and utilization ( r = 0.463, p = 0.001). Regression analysis showed that perception significantly predicted utilization (R² = 0.220, p = 0.001), while designation ( p = 0.021), research experience ( p = 0.007), and area of specialization ( p = 0.006) significantly influenced utilization. Relative Importance Index analysis indicated higher use of AI for automation tasks and lower use in methodology design and data interpretation. Healthcare professionals demonstrated moderate perception but limited utilization of AI in research. Strengthening AI-focused training, improving access to advanced AI tools, and enhancing institutional support may facilitate effective AI integration into healthcare research and improve evidence-based practice.

Scientific Reports
Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Al Baha University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.