A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Commercially Available Molecularly Matched Targeted Therapies in the Second-Line Setting

Abstract Background Initial studies have shown improved outcomes in patients receiving cancer therapies matched to their molecular alterations. To improve the chances of finding a therapeutic match for patients, this study evaluated the preliminary antitumor activity of 3 commercially available multi-targeted agents in the United States, regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib. Methods In this Phase II trial, patients who did not benefit from first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma underwent next-generation sequencing to identify actionable genomic alterations. Eligible patients, based on identified mutations deemed treatable by regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, were enrolled to receive matched targeted therapies. Outcomes were monitored via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with dose modifications per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. v4.03 guidelines for adverse events (AEs). Results One hundred patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled across tumor types. Median treatment durations were 12 weeks (regorafenib), 10.7 weeks (afatinib), and 24.1 weeks (cabozantinib). The overall objective response rate was 7.0%, with 1 complete response and 8 partial responses. The clinical benefit rate, including responses and stable disease >6 months, was 16.0%. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 months for urothelial carcinoma to 3.2 months for NSCLC. Toxicities were common for all medications; for regorafenib, 90.7% of patients had AEs (50% Grade 3/4); for afatinib, 86% of patients had AEs (54% Grade 3/4); for cabozantinib, 100% of patients had AEs (36% Grade 3/4). The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and stomatitis. Conclusions Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib had modest effects when used as molecularly matched targeted therapies in patients with NSCLC, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma in the second-line setting. Future research could examine more precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and evaluate combination therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag279
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Commercially Available Molecularly Matched Targeted Therapies in the Second-Line Setting

Stéphanie Graff, Jones Sf, Gerald Falchook, Deepak Kilari et al.
The Oncologist
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Commercially Available Molecularly Matched Targeted Therapies in the Second-Line Setting

Stéphanie Graff, Jones Sf, Gerald Falchook, Deepak Kilari, Todd Gersten, Howard A Burris, Maen Hussein, Edward Arrowsmith, Ivor Percent
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Initial studies have shown improved outcomes in patients receiving cancer therapies matched to their molecular alterations. To improve the chances of finding a therapeutic match for patients, this study evaluated the preliminary antitumor activity of 3 commercially available multi-targeted agents in the United States, regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib. Methods In this Phase II trial, patients who did not benefit from first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma underwent next-generation sequencing to identify actionable genomic alterations. Eligible patients, based on identified mutations deemed treatable by regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, were enrolled to receive matched targeted therapies. Outcomes were monitored via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with dose modifications per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. v4.03 guidelines for adverse events (AEs). Results One hundred patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled across tumor types. Median treatment durations were 12 weeks (regorafenib), 10.7 weeks (afatinib), and 24.1 weeks (cabozantinib). The overall objective response rate was 7.0%, with 1 complete response and 8 partial responses. The clinical benefit rate, including responses and stable disease >6 months, was 16.0%. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 months for urothelial carcinoma to 3.2 months for NSCLC. Toxicities were common for all medications; for regorafenib, 90.7% of patients had AEs (50% Grade 3/4); for afatinib, 86% of patients had AEs (54% Grade 3/4); for cabozantinib, 100% of patients had AEs (36% Grade 3/4). The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and stomatitis. Conclusions Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib had modest effects when used as molecularly matched targeted therapies in patients with NSCLC, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma in the second-line setting. Future research could examine more precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and evaluate combination therapies.

The Oncologist
Medical College of Wisconsin (US), HCA Midwest Division (US), Sarah Cannon (US), Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute (US), Tennessee Oncology (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.