The Shape of a Total Theory's Base: Categorial Foreclosures and What They Force

A total theory quantifies over everything, including its own theorists, and a companion paper derives the domains any such theory must address. This paper asks the successor question: what kind of thing could address all of them? A theory discharges a domain by account when the phenomenon arises from its base's general primitives — with no primitive whose sole job is that phenomenon, even a declared one. Under this criterion, a base's fundamental ontological category can close the by-account route to a domain while leaving principled denial open, and three such foreclosures hold at graded strengths. Pure structure cannot self-anchor: a theorem in a stated setting, by Newman's and Putnam's arguments. A base of third-person facts, whether static or dynamical, forecloses interiority: strong, conditional on the explanatory-gap premise and the by-account criterion. An experience-first base forecloses the determinate world: defeasible, since experience already carries rich structure. Jointly with the coherence conditions, the foreclosures yield a target specification for any theory that takes the by-account route everywhere: its base carries both an intrinsic and an extrinsic aspect in its general primitives, with the extrinsic aspect borne by genuine relations rather than coordinated parallelism; its dynamics govern the theorist's own operation; its reference is fixed by a natural relation internal to the base; and a well-defined formal object stands beneath all of it, its intrinsic aspect's granularity left open as a symmetric residue between a per-unit and a cosmic bearer. The genuine-relations requirement rests on a naturalness premise about reference that a covariational reliabilist can decline, and the paper carries that conditionality. Two worked systems occupy the unforeclosed region, Whitehead's per-unit event ontology and Spinoza's cosmic substance, and each leaves the formal object unbuilt; a formalized both-poles ontology is the outstanding construction. The specification narrows the search space for total theories. It certifies no candidate, and names none.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21498803
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Shape of a Total Theory's Base: Categorial Foreclosures and What They Force

Jeff Wozniak
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

The Shape of a Total Theory's Base: Categorial Foreclosures and What They Force

Jeff Wozniak
preprint en

Abstract

A total theory quantifies over everything, including its own theorists, and a companion paper derives the domains any such theory must address. This paper asks the successor question: what kind of thing could address all of them? A theory discharges a domain by account when the phenomenon arises from its base's general primitives — with no primitive whose sole job is that phenomenon, even a declared one. Under this criterion, a base's fundamental ontological category can close the by-account route to a domain while leaving principled denial open, and three such foreclosures hold at graded strengths. Pure structure cannot self-anchor: a theorem in a stated setting, by Newman's and Putnam's arguments. A base of third-person facts, whether static or dynamical, forecloses interiority: strong, conditional on the explanatory-gap premise and the by-account criterion. An experience-first base forecloses the determinate world: defeasible, since experience already carries rich structure. Jointly with the coherence conditions, the foreclosures yield a target specification for any theory that takes the by-account route everywhere: its base carries both an intrinsic and an extrinsic aspect in its general primitives, with the extrinsic aspect borne by genuine relations rather than coordinated parallelism; its dynamics govern the theorist's own operation; its reference is fixed by a natural relation internal to the base; and a well-defined formal object stands beneath all of it, its intrinsic aspect's granularity left open as a symmetric residue between a per-unit and a cosmic bearer. The genuine-relations requirement rests on a naturalness premise about reference that a covariational reliabilist can decline, and the paper carries that conditionality. Two worked systems occupy the unforeclosed region, Whitehead's per-unit event ontology and Spinoza's cosmic substance, and each leaves the formal object unbuilt; a formalized both-poles ontology is the outstanding construction. The specification narrows the search space for total theories. It certifies no candidate, and names none.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.