Teaching Legal Creativity: Really?

‘Legal creativity’ is a popular buzzword used to describe one of the core skills successful lawyers are expected to command. Accordingly, it is a common understanding that legal education should train students to become creative lawyers. Interestingly, however, there is not much discussion about how this learning outcome can be achieved. Even more startling, the notion of ‘legal creativity’ as such is hardly ever explained in detail. This article originally aimed to fill the existing gap(s) by exploring what legal creativity means and how legal creativity can and should be taught. The research underpinning this article led to the surprising discovery that the notion of legal creativity is nothing but a triviality and—as far as legal reasoning is concerned—even an oxymoron. Legal education can therefore ignore the notion of legal creativity and focus on what is really important, that is, critical thinking, problem-solving and advocacy skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Legal Education
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23220058261468196
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Legal Creativity: Really?

Lutz-Christian Wolff
Asian Journal of Legal Education
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Teaching Legal Creativity: Really?

Lutz-Christian Wolff
article en

Abstract

‘Legal creativity’ is a popular buzzword used to describe one of the core skills successful lawyers are expected to command. Accordingly, it is a common understanding that legal education should train students to become creative lawyers. Interestingly, however, there is not much discussion about how this learning outcome can be achieved. Even more startling, the notion of ‘legal creativity’ as such is hardly ever explained in detail. This article originally aimed to fill the existing gap(s) by exploring what legal creativity means and how legal creativity can and should be taught. The research underpinning this article led to the surprising discovery that the notion of legal creativity is nothing but a triviality and—as far as legal reasoning is concerned—even an oxymoron. Legal education can therefore ignore the notion of legal creativity and focus on what is really important, that is, critical thinking, problem-solving and advocacy skills.

Asian Journal of Legal Education
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.