Osteoarthritis risk associated with denosumab in adults with osteoporosis: A target trial emulation

Abstract Denosumab, a well-established osteoporosis treatment, has demonstrated potential bone- and cartilage-protective effects in preclinical and early trials. However, it remains unclear whether these promising findings extend to osteoarthritis prevention in weight-bearing joints and broader real-world osteoporotic populations. We compared osteoarthritis incidence between denosumab and oral bisphosphonates in adults aged 50 years or older with osteoporosis using a sequential nested target trial emulation with propensity score matching based on longitudinal health insurance claims data from Japan collected between 2015 and 2024. Two target comparisons were conducted: one compared new users of denosumab with new users of oral bisphosphonates, and the other compared patients who switched from oral bisphosphonates to denosumab with those who continued oral bisphosphonates. The primary outcome was osteoarthritis incidence. Secondary outcomes included joint-specific osteoarthritis (knee, hip, and hand) over 3 years. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and relative risk (RR) at 3 years were estimated using a Kaplan–Meier estimator in both the per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. In the per-protocol analyses, the ARR for incident osteoarthritis was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1%–3.2%) in the new-user comparison, with an RR of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73–0.91), and 0.9% (95% CI, –0.2% to 2.8%) in the switch-continue comparison, with an RR of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76–1.02). In the intention-to-treat analyses, the corresponding ARR was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.3%–3.3%) in the new-user comparison, with an RR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73–0.89), and 1.2% (95% CI, –0.2% to 2.7%) in the switch-continue comparison, with an RR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.77–1.02). Denosumab initiation was associated with a modestly lower risk of incident osteoarthritis than oral bisphosphonate initiation, although the association was weaker in the switch-continue comparison.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag113
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Osteoarthritis risk associated with denosumab in adults with osteoporosis: A target trial emulation

Taku Saito, Akira Okada, Yuya Kimura, Hisatoshi Ishikura et al.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Osteoarthritis risk associated with denosumab in adults with osteoporosis: A target trial emulation

Taku Saito, Akira Okada, Yuya Kimura, Hisatoshi Ishikura, Takeyuki Tanaka, Sakae Tanaka, Masaki Hatano, Hideo Yasunaga
article en

Abstract

Abstract Denosumab, a well-established osteoporosis treatment, has demonstrated potential bone- and cartilage-protective effects in preclinical and early trials. However, it remains unclear whether these promising findings extend to osteoarthritis prevention in weight-bearing joints and broader real-world osteoporotic populations. We compared osteoarthritis incidence between denosumab and oral bisphosphonates in adults aged 50 years or older with osteoporosis using a sequential nested target trial emulation with propensity score matching based on longitudinal health insurance claims data from Japan collected between 2015 and 2024. Two target comparisons were conducted: one compared new users of denosumab with new users of oral bisphosphonates, and the other compared patients who switched from oral bisphosphonates to denosumab with those who continued oral bisphosphonates. The primary outcome was osteoarthritis incidence. Secondary outcomes included joint-specific osteoarthritis (knee, hip, and hand) over 3 years. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and relative risk (RR) at 3 years were estimated using a Kaplan–Meier estimator in both the per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. In the per-protocol analyses, the ARR for incident osteoarthritis was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1%–3.2%) in the new-user comparison, with an RR of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73–0.91), and 0.9% (95% CI, –0.2% to 2.8%) in the switch-continue comparison, with an RR of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76–1.02). In the intention-to-treat analyses, the corresponding ARR was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.3%–3.3%) in the new-user comparison, with an RR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73–0.89), and 1.2% (95% CI, –0.2% to 2.7%) in the switch-continue comparison, with an RR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.77–1.02). Denosumab initiation was associated with a modestly lower risk of incident osteoarthritis than oral bisphosphonate initiation, although the association was weaker in the switch-continue comparison.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.