Influence of elevation, climate, snowmelt and floral abundance on body size of solitary bees

Abstract In mountain ecosystems, spring snowmelt triggers rapid plant growth and bee emergence from overwintering. These habitats are warming rapidly under climate change, leading to earlier snowmelt, flowering and bee emergence. Early snowmelt exposes new plant growth to late spring frosts and leaves the soil drier during the summer, reducing flower abundance peaks. Given that fewer flowers can impact intra‐specific bee body size in agricultural systems, we investigated possible knock‐on effects of a warming climate on intraspecific variation in bee body size using 10 years of solitary and facultatively eusocial bee specimens collected in Colorado, USA, along an elevation gradient. We asked: (1) How does body size vary with elevation? (2) Do snowmelt timing, summer precipitation or winter cold severity directly impact body size? (3) Do these climate variables affect body size indirectly through their effects on flower abundance? We found that specimens of the seven bee species we measured exhibited 5.3%–8.2% variation in body size. We were able to examine associations with elevation in four species, and in two of these we found significantly larger bees at lower elevations. Snowmelt timing the year prior was directly associated with body size of the offspring generation in only two of seven species, with smaller bees in earlier snowmelt years. Rainfall and cold severity had no significant direct relationships with body size. Although flower abundance was strongly dependent on snowmelt timing and summer precipitation, the body size of only one bee species had a significant (but weak) relationship with floral abundance. While these solitary bees varied intra‐specifically in size, the environmental variables we examined did not consistently explain this variation, suggesting that other unmeasured factors are more important in driving body size variation in our study species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Entomology
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/een.70128
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of elevation, climate, snowmelt and floral abundance on body size of solitary bees

Ian Breckheimer, Lachlan C. Jones, Kristin Conrad, Jane E. Ogilvie et al.
Ecological Entomology
Plant and animal studies
article

Influence of elevation, climate, snowmelt and floral abundance on body size of solitary bees

Ian Breckheimer, Lachlan C. Jones, Kristin Conrad, Jane E. Ogilvie, Melanie R. Kazenel, Rebecca E. Irwin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In mountain ecosystems, spring snowmelt triggers rapid plant growth and bee emergence from overwintering. These habitats are warming rapidly under climate change, leading to earlier snowmelt, flowering and bee emergence. Early snowmelt exposes new plant growth to late spring frosts and leaves the soil drier during the summer, reducing flower abundance peaks. Given that fewer flowers can impact intra‐specific bee body size in agricultural systems, we investigated possible knock‐on effects of a warming climate on intraspecific variation in bee body size using 10 years of solitary and facultatively eusocial bee specimens collected in Colorado, USA, along an elevation gradient. We asked: (1) How does body size vary with elevation? (2) Do snowmelt timing, summer precipitation or winter cold severity directly impact body size? (3) Do these climate variables affect body size indirectly through their effects on flower abundance? We found that specimens of the seven bee species we measured exhibited 5.3%–8.2% variation in body size. We were able to examine associations with elevation in four species, and in two of these we found significantly larger bees at lower elevations. Snowmelt timing the year prior was directly associated with body size of the offspring generation in only two of seven species, with smaller bees in earlier snowmelt years. Rainfall and cold severity had no significant direct relationships with body size. Although flower abundance was strongly dependent on snowmelt timing and summer precipitation, the body size of only one bee species had a significant (but weak) relationship with floral abundance. While these solitary bees varied intra‐specifically in size, the environmental variables we examined did not consistently explain this variation, suggesting that other unmeasured factors are more important in driving body size variation in our study species.

Ecological Entomology
North Carolina State University (US), Western Colorado University (US), Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.