Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial

This study addresses a critical gap in the evidence base for cost-effective psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in forensic settings by presenting a full trial-based economic evaluation of mentalisation-based treatment plus probation as usual (MBT-ASPD + PAU), compared to PAU alone, for males with ASPD convicted of an offence in England and Wales. The economic evaluation adopted a societal perspective, incorporating costs to health care, the criminal justice system, and the wider societal impact of offending. Outcomes were assessed 24 months post-randomisation. The primary cost–utility analysis compared costs with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, while a secondary cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs with aggression outcomes measured by the Overt Aggression Scale – Modified (OAS-M). Although missing data limited definitive conclusions regarding service use, available data suggest that participants in the PAU group spent more time in custody than those in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group. Utility scores and quality of life showed minimal variation over follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Overall costs were lower in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group, though not statistically significant. Over the 24-month period, MBT-ASPD + PAU was associated with both reduced costs and lower aggression (as reflected in OAS-M scores), indicating that each unit reduction in aggression yielded a cost saving of approximately £93. For QALYs, MBT-ASPD + PAU appeared cost-effective compared to PAU across all values a decision-maker may be willing to pay for improvements in outcome. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the potential economic value of MBT-ASPD + PAU in a forensic ASPD population, particularly in relation to aggression reduction and the associated cost savings. Trial registration This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN 32309003).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352865
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial

Zoë Hoare, James M. S. Wason, Peter Fonagy, A. Frater et al.
PLoS ONE
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial

Zoë Hoare, James M. S. Wason, Peter Fonagy, A. Frater, Barbara Barrett, Jessica Yakeley, Stephen Pilling, Karen Yirmiya, Elizabeth Simes, Mary McMurran, Elizabeth Allison, Stephen Butler, Mike Crawford, Angus Cameron, Paul Moran, Anthony Bateman
article en

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in the evidence base for cost-effective psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in forensic settings by presenting a full trial-based economic evaluation of mentalisation-based treatment plus probation as usual (MBT-ASPD + PAU), compared to PAU alone, for males with ASPD convicted of an offence in England and Wales. The economic evaluation adopted a societal perspective, incorporating costs to health care, the criminal justice system, and the wider societal impact of offending. Outcomes were assessed 24 months post-randomisation. The primary cost–utility analysis compared costs with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, while a secondary cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs with aggression outcomes measured by the Overt Aggression Scale – Modified (OAS-M). Although missing data limited definitive conclusions regarding service use, available data suggest that participants in the PAU group spent more time in custody than those in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group. Utility scores and quality of life showed minimal variation over follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Overall costs were lower in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group, though not statistically significant. Over the 24-month period, MBT-ASPD + PAU was associated with both reduced costs and lower aggression (as reflected in OAS-M scores), indicating that each unit reduction in aggression yielded a cost saving of approximately £93. For QALYs, MBT-ASPD + PAU appeared cost-effective compared to PAU across all values a decision-maker may be willing to pay for improvements in outcome. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the potential economic value of MBT-ASPD + PAU in a forensic ASPD population, particularly in relation to aggression reduction and the associated cost savings. Trial registration This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN 32309003).

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.