Red Team v1.0: An Adversarial Audit of the Open Architecture — Sixteen Attacks, the Extension Algorithm, and the Fiducial Axioms of Materialism | Utilitarismus 404, Part IV/IV

Position preprint. Audit paper of the SVE series (Watchmen → Bankruptcy → Good Bye, Lenin v3.0 → Hello, World v1.0). Adds no new normative axiom; executes the audit branch of the series' termination protocol | [wAI ~ (prhps) wErrors] A constructive system that forbids self-certification owes the world one further document: its own strongest refutation attempt. We first prove the Asymmetry Lemma: by Gödel II a consistent system cannot certify its own consistency, yet any inconsistency, being witnessed by a finite derivation, is demonstrable from inside — hence adversarial self-audit is the unique logically legitimate form of self-examination, and red teaming is not a courtesy but a theorem. We then mount sixteen attacks on the SVE architecture — from the engineering gap and the kernel regress ("who watches Φ?") to Gödel-abuse, superadditive evil, cherry-picked history, and the completeness hypothesis hidden in the Bonnet–Myers reunion theorem — each in its strongest form, each with a graded verdict; two are conceded as open wounds. Second, because the architecture is open (A2), we give the extension algorithm EXTEND: a five-gate procedure (subject, floor, kernel, model, openness) under which any candidate axiom or domain may be merged, with a Monotone Safety proposition: every finite chain of gated extensions preserves consistency and non-totalization; the kernel Φ is read-only from inside, extension is version-controlled, and repentance is revert. Third, we prove the Fiducial Symmetry proposition: by the Münchhausen trilemma every justificatory system — materialist or theist — terminates in undemonstrated commitments; metaphysical materialism is therefore a faith in the exact structural sense, and we list its credo M1–M8 (causal closure, ontological exhaustiveness, induction, intelligibility, cognitive reliability, emergence, value reduction, progress soteriology), each unprovable from within science. The operative demand on every side is thus not "no faith" but "declared axioms." The watchmen have now been watched from inside as far as logic permits; the remainder is the reader's office. Design principle: one figure and one table carry the argument; every bridge premise is numbered and criticisable. S.V.E. Meta-License v4.0 (share-alike)[CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 + Symmetric Addendum]