Systematic assessment of sequencing depth requirements for Hi-C-derived metrics

BACKGROUND: Hi-C experiments produce genome-wide chromatin contact maps from which structural features can be quantified across multiple genomic scales, ranging from megabase-scale compartments to kilobase-scale boundaries and chromatin loops. Although high-resolution analyses commonly rely on hundreds of millions of sequenced read pairs, the minimum sequencing depth required for different classes of Hi-C-derived features has not been systematically established. We therefore sought to determine these depth requirements systematically. RESULTS: We performed progressive random subsampling of twelve Hi-C libraries representing multiple cell types and experimental protocols. Loop-density and loop-size inference from the P(s) log-derivative was evaluated across all libraries, whereas compartment, insulation, and boundary analyses were performed on a subset of nine libraries with comparable full-depth coverage. Rather than defining a "sufficient depth" as an arbitrary fraction of the full-depth value, we introduced a biologically motivated criterion based on the variability of the metric between independent biological replicates. The required sequencing depth for each metric was defined as the point at which the subsampling scatter first reached the variability observed between independent biological replicates, representing the accuracy that additional sequencing cannot improve upon. Using this criterion, the genome-average loop-density estimate reached its biological floor at approximately 7 million read pairs, the genome-average loop-size estimate at approximately 20 million, insulation scores at approximately 80 million, and compartment eigenvectors at 100-kilobase resolution at approximately 110 million read pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Different Hi-C-derived metrics require substantially different sequencing depths to achieve biologically meaningful accuracy. For all metrics, depth-induced variability fell below biological replicate variability well before full sequencing depth was reached. These thresholds apply to genome-averaged characteristics, not local metrics of specific loci. They therefore provide practical guidance for genome-wide experimental design and sequencing budget allocation, suggesting that increasing the number of biological replicates is likely to improve the inference of global biophysical features more effectively than sequencing individual libraries to greater depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Genomics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13455-7
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic assessment of sequencing depth requirements for Hi-C-derived metrics

Kirill Polovnikov, Alexander Granovsky
BMC Genomics
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
article

Systematic assessment of sequencing depth requirements for Hi-C-derived metrics

Kirill Polovnikov, Alexander Granovsky
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hi-C experiments produce genome-wide chromatin contact maps from which structural features can be quantified across multiple genomic scales, ranging from megabase-scale compartments to kilobase-scale boundaries and chromatin loops. Although high-resolution analyses commonly rely on hundreds of millions of sequenced read pairs, the minimum sequencing depth required for different classes of Hi-C-derived features has not been systematically established. We therefore sought to determine these depth requirements systematically. RESULTS: We performed progressive random subsampling of twelve Hi-C libraries representing multiple cell types and experimental protocols. Loop-density and loop-size inference from the P(s) log-derivative was evaluated across all libraries, whereas compartment, insulation, and boundary analyses were performed on a subset of nine libraries with comparable full-depth coverage. Rather than defining a "sufficient depth" as an arbitrary fraction of the full-depth value, we introduced a biologically motivated criterion based on the variability of the metric between independent biological replicates. The required sequencing depth for each metric was defined as the point at which the subsampling scatter first reached the variability observed between independent biological replicates, representing the accuracy that additional sequencing cannot improve upon. Using this criterion, the genome-average loop-density estimate reached its biological floor at approximately 7 million read pairs, the genome-average loop-size estimate at approximately 20 million, insulation scores at approximately 80 million, and compartment eigenvectors at 100-kilobase resolution at approximately 110 million read pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Different Hi-C-derived metrics require substantially different sequencing depths to achieve biologically meaningful accuracy. For all metrics, depth-induced variability fell below biological replicate variability well before full sequencing depth was reached. These thresholds apply to genome-averaged characteristics, not local metrics of specific loci. They therefore provide practical guidance for genome-wide experimental design and sequencing budget allocation, suggesting that increasing the number of biological replicates is likely to improve the inference of global biophysical features more effectively than sequencing individual libraries to greater depth.

BMC GenomicsVol. 27(1)
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU), University of Potsdam (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.