Objective assessment of surgeon’s ergonomics and posture in robotic-assisted (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy during vascular structures isolation

Abstract Background Suboptimal ergonomic postures during surgical procedures increase the susceptibility to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. We objectively compared surgeons’ ergonomics and posture between robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy, using the validated rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) score. Methods A prospective observational study evaluated 59 lobectomies performed by seven surgeons. Surgeon’s joint angles were tracked during real-life procedures using two software applications (Kinovea-0.9.5 and APECS platform). Sagittal and dorsal videos were recorded during robot ( n = 31) and multiportal thoracoscopic ( n = 28) lobectomies. We calculated neck, shoulder, elbow, trunk, hip, knee, and specific tilt angles to estimate the RULA scores for ergonomic risk during dissection/division of vascular structures. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to adjust for intra-surgeon clustering and anthropometrics. Results The RULA score was significantly lower in the RATS (4.7±0.5) compared to VATS-group (7.0±0.6) ( p < 0.001), indicating a high ergonomic risk for surgeons in the VATS-group, versus a low-to-medium risk in the RATS-group. The mean joint angles of neck, trunk, neck-tilt and shoulder-tilt were significantly higher in VATS ( p < 0.001), while the elbow angles were significantly greater in RATS ( p < 0.001). There was no significant intergroup difference regarding shoulder angles ( p = 0.21) or operative time ( p = 0.53). A within-surgeon subgroup analysis confirmed these postural advantages are intrinsically driven by the robotic platform. Inter-software agreement between the tracking platforms was excellent (mean intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). Conclusions RATS demonstrated superior ergonomics and posture compared to VATS, with lower associated risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Integrating ergonomic checklists into surgical training is essential to minimize occupational injury risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-026-00215-2
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective assessment of surgeon’s ergonomics and posture in robotic-assisted (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy during vascular structures isolation

Ahmed Elkhouly, Ben Shanahan, Gowthanan Santhirakumaran, Tim Batchelor et al.
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Objective assessment of surgeon’s ergonomics and posture in robotic-assisted (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy during vascular structures isolation

Ahmed Elkhouly, Ben Shanahan, Gowthanan Santhirakumaran, Tim Batchelor, Henrietta Wilson, Steven Stamenkovic, David Waller, Aya F. Elsebaey, Kelvin Lau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Suboptimal ergonomic postures during surgical procedures increase the susceptibility to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. We objectively compared surgeons’ ergonomics and posture between robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy, using the validated rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) score. Methods A prospective observational study evaluated 59 lobectomies performed by seven surgeons. Surgeon’s joint angles were tracked during real-life procedures using two software applications (Kinovea-0.9.5 and APECS platform). Sagittal and dorsal videos were recorded during robot ( n = 31) and multiportal thoracoscopic ( n = 28) lobectomies. We calculated neck, shoulder, elbow, trunk, hip, knee, and specific tilt angles to estimate the RULA scores for ergonomic risk during dissection/division of vascular structures. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to adjust for intra-surgeon clustering and anthropometrics. Results The RULA score was significantly lower in the RATS (4.7±0.5) compared to VATS-group (7.0±0.6) ( p < 0.001), indicating a high ergonomic risk for surgeons in the VATS-group, versus a low-to-medium risk in the RATS-group. The mean joint angles of neck, trunk, neck-tilt and shoulder-tilt were significantly higher in VATS ( p < 0.001), while the elbow angles were significantly greater in RATS ( p < 0.001). There was no significant intergroup difference regarding shoulder angles ( p = 0.21) or operative time ( p = 0.53). A within-surgeon subgroup analysis confirmed these postural advantages are intrinsically driven by the robotic platform. Inter-software agreement between the tracking platforms was excellent (mean intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). Conclusions RATS demonstrated superior ergonomics and posture compared to VATS, with lower associated risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Integrating ergonomic checklists into surgical training is essential to minimize occupational injury risks.

The Cardiothoracic SurgeonVol. 34(1)
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Tanta University (EG), Tanta University Hospital (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.