Geometric and Visual SLAM: The accuracy of modern handheld LiDAR scanners

Abstract. Recent handheld scanners increasingly integrate geometric (LiDAR-based) and visual (image-based) SLAM (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping), promising low-cost and flexible solutions for surveying tasks. This paper evaluates the accuracy of three such systems: the XGRIDS Lixel K1, the SHARE S20, and a Pix4D solution pairing an iPhone Pro with an Emlid Reach RX GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) antenna. We conducted experiments in two distinct environments: Scene 1, with continuous, high-quality RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) coverage, and Scene 2, which included an indoor trajectory resulting in a temporary loss of the RTK fix. Accuracy was validated against independent GNSS check points. In Scene 1, the Pix4D solution delivered survey-grade results, achieving a RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) below 3 cm in the X, Y , and Z directions. The XGRIDS and SHARE scanners yielded larger maximum errors, around 10 to 15 cm. In Scene 2, accuracy degraded; the Pix4D solution’s maximum error increased to approximately 12 cm , while the Share S20’s maximum error exceeded 25 cm. We conclude that while the fusion of visual and geometric SLAM is powerful, a stable RTK fix remains critical for achieving consistent surveygrade accuracy with current low-cost handheld scanners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b1-2026-193-2026
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric and Visual SLAM: The accuracy of modern handheld LiDAR scanners

Christoph Strecha, Marta Coelho Lopes, Davide A. Cucci, Pierangelo Rothenbühler et al.
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Geometric and Visual SLAM: The accuracy of modern handheld LiDAR scanners

Christoph Strecha, Marta Coelho Lopes, Davide A. Cucci, Pierangelo Rothenbühler, Ryan Hughes, Andrea Dotti
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Recent handheld scanners increasingly integrate geometric (LiDAR-based) and visual (image-based) SLAM (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping), promising low-cost and flexible solutions for surveying tasks. This paper evaluates the accuracy of three such systems: the XGRIDS Lixel K1, the SHARE S20, and a Pix4D solution pairing an iPhone Pro with an Emlid Reach RX GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) antenna. We conducted experiments in two distinct environments: Scene 1, with continuous, high-quality RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) coverage, and Scene 2, which included an indoor trajectory resulting in a temporary loss of the RTK fix. Accuracy was validated against independent GNSS check points. In Scene 1, the Pix4D solution delivered survey-grade results, achieving a RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) below 3 cm in the X, Y , and Z directions. The XGRIDS and SHARE scanners yielded larger maximum errors, around 10 to 15 cm. In Scene 2, accuracy degraded; the Pix4D solution’s maximum error increased to approximately 12 cm , while the Share S20’s maximum error exceeded 25 cm. We conclude that while the fusion of visual and geometric SLAM is powerful, a stable RTK fix remains critical for achieving consistent surveygrade accuracy with current low-cost handheld scanners.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B1-2026
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.