Rethinking ‘empathy’ in feminist fieldwork

This article reflects on what fieldwork taught me about empathy as a methodological tool in feminist fieldwork through three autobiographical encounters from developmental research in West Bengal, India. It traces how empathy – trained, performed and institutionally sanctioned – can function less as a bridge across difference and more as a buffer against confronting the extractive dimensions of knowledge production. It further questions how ethical conventions like anonymisation and reflexivity can become rituals of comfort that protect researcher credibility rather than community dignity. This piece draws on fieldwork conducted during my master’s dissertation; however, written at the threshold of doctoral research, this is an attempt to extend fieldwork practices that prioritise accountability, genuine participation and the right to refuse over the performance of ethical compliance. It asks what it would mean to design research that is not just empathetic but answerable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Geographies
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740261470818
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking ‘empathy’ in feminist fieldwork

Patatri Baidya
Cultural Geographies
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Rethinking ‘empathy’ in feminist fieldwork

Patatri Baidya
article en

Abstract

This article reflects on what fieldwork taught me about empathy as a methodological tool in feminist fieldwork through three autobiographical encounters from developmental research in West Bengal, India. It traces how empathy – trained, performed and institutionally sanctioned – can function less as a bridge across difference and more as a buffer against confronting the extractive dimensions of knowledge production. It further questions how ethical conventions like anonymisation and reflexivity can become rituals of comfort that protect researcher credibility rather than community dignity. This piece draws on fieldwork conducted during my master’s dissertation; however, written at the threshold of doctoral research, this is an attempt to extend fieldwork practices that prioritise accountability, genuine participation and the right to refuse over the performance of ethical compliance. It asks what it would mean to design research that is not just empathetic but answerable.

Cultural Geographies
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.