Crack-stopping in natural and crushed filter materials assessed using the Sand Castle Test

Crack-initiated concentrated leakage is a critical loading case for embankment dams, and filters are expected to remain sufficiently collapsible to avoid sustaining an open crack or roof over a developing pipe. This paper compares candidate filter materials derived from natural soils and manufactured crushed rock. Sand Castle Test results quantify material-specific relationships between relative compaction and collapse time, and are interpreted using established collapse time reference markers. Compared with natural materials, crushed rock materials generally require less compaction to develop the potential to support a roof over a developing pipe and are more sensitive to overcompaction, such that relatively small increases in densification could lead to substantially longer collapse times and reduced collapsibility. Within this sand and gravel candidate filter dataset, excluding tailings and with non-plastic fines up to 13% passing 0·075 mm, material origin and processing provided clearer separation than fines content alone. The findings support practical compaction control and screening in filter selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Géotechnique Letters
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.26.00030
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crack-stopping in natural and crushed filter materials assessed using the Sand Castle Test

Hans Rönnqvist
Géotechnique Letters
Dam Engineering and Safety
article

Crack-stopping in natural and crushed filter materials assessed using the Sand Castle Test

Hans Rönnqvist
article en

Abstract

Crack-initiated concentrated leakage is a critical loading case for embankment dams, and filters are expected to remain sufficiently collapsible to avoid sustaining an open crack or roof over a developing pipe. This paper compares candidate filter materials derived from natural soils and manufactured crushed rock. Sand Castle Test results quantify material-specific relationships between relative compaction and collapse time, and are interpreted using established collapse time reference markers. Compared with natural materials, crushed rock materials generally require less compaction to develop the potential to support a roof over a developing pipe and are more sensitive to overcompaction, such that relatively small increases in densification could lead to substantially longer collapse times and reduced collapsibility. Within this sand and gravel candidate filter dataset, excluding tailings and with non-plastic fines up to 13% passing 0·075 mm, material origin and processing provided clearer separation than fines content alone. The findings support practical compaction control and screening in filter selection.

Géotechnique Letters
IQ Samhällsbyggnad (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dam Engineering and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crack-stopping in natural and crushed filter materials assessed using the Sand Castle Test — Hans Rönnqvist · Géotechnique Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS