Robotic hepatectomy for benign liver disease: single-centre consecutive series and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive and open approaches

Benign hepatic disease carries a distinctive ethical imperative to minimize perioperative morbidity in patients who might otherwise live asymptomatic lives. Minimally invasive approaches reduce pain, hospitalization, and recovery time, but laparoscopic resection of anatomically challenging posterosuperior segments remains technically demanding. Robotic hepatectomy may overcome these limitations. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, learning curve, and comparative effectiveness of robotic hepatectomy in benign disease. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive single-surgeon series of 62 robotic hepatectomies for benign disease, including a learning-curve analysis, and performed a parallel meta-analysis of 7 comparative studies stratified by surgical approach and lesion complexity. Robotic resection demonstrated excellent safety (1.6% major complication rate, 0% 90-day mortality, 0% readmissions) and reproducibility. The IWATE score reliably stratified cases and predicted operative duration. In the literature, robotic and laparoscopic resection showed comparable operative time, blood loss, and length of stay, with only a modestly longer robotic operative time in isolated resections (SMD + 0.52, p = 0.0046). Compared with open surgery, the robotic approach achieved significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (SMD - 0.94, p < 0.0001) and a shorter hospital stay (SMD - 1.32, p = 0.0253), with comparable operative time. The blood-loss advantage over open surgery was confirmed in strictly isolated benign resections (SMD - 0.71, p = 0.0004; I² = 0%). Robotic hepatectomy is safe, reproducible, and demonstrates clear learning curve plateau in benign disease and a stepping-stone strategy for malignant liver diseases. Robotic resection reliably accesses posterosuperior segments with low conversion rates, making it an attractive minimally invasive alternative that extends laparoscopic reach. In benign disease, where morbidity minimization and rapid recovery are paramount, robotic surgery offers a compelling new option. Future prospective, multicenter, randomized studies are needed for cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03692-z
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic hepatectomy for benign liver disease: single-centre consecutive series and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive and open approaches

R. Scarponi, Germano Guerra, Pasquale Avella, Aldo Rocca et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Robotic hepatectomy for benign liver disease: single-centre consecutive series and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive and open approaches

R. Scarponi, Germano Guerra, Pasquale Avella, Aldo Rocca, Salvatore Spiezia, Graziano Ceccarelli, Lorenzo Mariani, Luca Ballelli, Paolo Bianco
article en

Abstract

Benign hepatic disease carries a distinctive ethical imperative to minimize perioperative morbidity in patients who might otherwise live asymptomatic lives. Minimally invasive approaches reduce pain, hospitalization, and recovery time, but laparoscopic resection of anatomically challenging posterosuperior segments remains technically demanding. Robotic hepatectomy may overcome these limitations. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, learning curve, and comparative effectiveness of robotic hepatectomy in benign disease. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive single-surgeon series of 62 robotic hepatectomies for benign disease, including a learning-curve analysis, and performed a parallel meta-analysis of 7 comparative studies stratified by surgical approach and lesion complexity. Robotic resection demonstrated excellent safety (1.6% major complication rate, 0% 90-day mortality, 0% readmissions) and reproducibility. The IWATE score reliably stratified cases and predicted operative duration. In the literature, robotic and laparoscopic resection showed comparable operative time, blood loss, and length of stay, with only a modestly longer robotic operative time in isolated resections (SMD + 0.52, p = 0.0046). Compared with open surgery, the robotic approach achieved significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (SMD - 0.94, p < 0.0001) and a shorter hospital stay (SMD - 1.32, p = 0.0253), with comparable operative time. The blood-loss advantage over open surgery was confirmed in strictly isolated benign resections (SMD - 0.71, p = 0.0004; I² = 0%). Robotic hepatectomy is safe, reproducible, and demonstrates clear learning curve plateau in benign disease and a stepping-stone strategy for malignant liver diseases. Robotic resection reliably accesses posterosuperior segments with low conversion rates, making it an attractive minimally invasive alternative that extends laparoscopic reach. In benign disease, where morbidity minimization and rapid recovery are paramount, robotic surgery offers a compelling new option. Future prospective, multicenter, randomized studies are needed for cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life analysis.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
University of Molise (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista (IT), Ospedale di Spoleto (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Villa Pineta Hospital (IT), Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (US), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Università degli Studi del Molise
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.