Review of oxygen measurement and relevance to the mechanisms of FLASH radiotherapy

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is the phenomenon of relative sparing of normal tissue when ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) are used compared with conventional dose rates (CDR) as clinically used. Despite extensive investigation, the underlying mechanisms remain unexplained. Among the proposed hypotheses, tissue oxygen has consistently been a central theme because oxygen is the most dominant factor known to modulate radiation-induced damage. The factors implicated in FLASH sparing include the baseline partial pressure of oxygen (pO 2 ), transient radiolytic oxygen consumption (ROC), and oxygen-dependent changes in the chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that vary with dose rate. This review synthesizes current evidence on in vivo oxygen measurement techniques, highlighting their capabilities and limitations in capturing the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tissue oxygenation. Key experimental studies in skin are summarized and interpreted by modulating oxygen levels via changes in inspired oxygen gas and vascular clamping interventions, demonstrating that the FLASH effect occurs only at intermediate baseline pO 2 (normoxic or slightly hypoxic) values, but not at hypoxia or hyperoxia. Direct measurement of oxygen consumption during UHDR irradiation is possible, providing one of the first in situ measurements of radiation chemistry in patients. In parallel, recent advances in fast in vitro radiation chemistry assays indicate that UHDR irradiation alters radical yields, favoring increased production of solvated electrons and reduced hydroxyl radical–mediated damage. Taken together, the available data suggest that the FLASH sparing effect arises from an interplay among the delivered dose and dose rate, local oxygen availability, and radiation chemistry, with tissue-specific variation in scavenging, leading to altered biological responses across the CDR-to-UHDR shift. This more complex interpretation seems more likely than the simpler interpretation of broad-area radiolytic oxygen depletion alone. However, it must be acknowledged that we have partial data on all aspects of this hypothesis, and further improvements in oxygen sampling are very likely to help in understanding ROS and scavenging effects in vivo . Key challenges in quantifying oxygen dynamics in vivo are highlighted, and the conclusions are used to identify critical areas for future research to enable mechanistic understanding and clinical translation of FLASH-RT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2026.1878483
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of oxygen measurement and relevance to the mechanisms of FLASH radiotherapy

David Hunter, Harold M. Swartz, William S. Thomas, Brian W. Pogue et al.
Frontiers in Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Review of oxygen measurement and relevance to the mechanisms of FLASH radiotherapy

David Hunter, Harold M. Swartz, William S. Thomas, Brian W. Pogue, Corbin Narita, Xu Cao
article en

Abstract

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is the phenomenon of relative sparing of normal tissue when ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) are used compared with conventional dose rates (CDR) as clinically used. Despite extensive investigation, the underlying mechanisms remain unexplained. Among the proposed hypotheses, tissue oxygen has consistently been a central theme because oxygen is the most dominant factor known to modulate radiation-induced damage. The factors implicated in FLASH sparing include the baseline partial pressure of oxygen (pO 2 ), transient radiolytic oxygen consumption (ROC), and oxygen-dependent changes in the chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that vary with dose rate. This review synthesizes current evidence on in vivo oxygen measurement techniques, highlighting their capabilities and limitations in capturing the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tissue oxygenation. Key experimental studies in skin are summarized and interpreted by modulating oxygen levels via changes in inspired oxygen gas and vascular clamping interventions, demonstrating that the FLASH effect occurs only at intermediate baseline pO 2 (normoxic or slightly hypoxic) values, but not at hypoxia or hyperoxia. Direct measurement of oxygen consumption during UHDR irradiation is possible, providing one of the first in situ measurements of radiation chemistry in patients. In parallel, recent advances in fast in vitro radiation chemistry assays indicate that UHDR irradiation alters radical yields, favoring increased production of solvated electrons and reduced hydroxyl radical–mediated damage. Taken together, the available data suggest that the FLASH sparing effect arises from an interplay among the delivered dose and dose rate, local oxygen availability, and radiation chemistry, with tissue-specific variation in scavenging, leading to altered biological responses across the CDR-to-UHDR shift. This more complex interpretation seems more likely than the simpler interpretation of broad-area radiolytic oxygen depletion alone. However, it must be acknowledged that we have partial data on all aspects of this hypothesis, and further improvements in oxygen sampling are very likely to help in understanding ROS and scavenging effects in vivo . Key challenges in quantifying oxygen dynamics in vivo are highlighted, and the conclusions are used to identify critical areas for future research to enable mechanistic understanding and clinical translation of FLASH-RT.

Frontiers in PhysicsVol. 14
Dartmouth College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Dartmouth College, Dartmouth Cancer Center, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.