Governance matters: evidence from ESG performance and stock misvaluation in China

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between firms' ESG performance, its three pillars as well as ESG disclosure and stock price efficiency in the Chinese stock market. It examines whether ESG engagement and ESG disclosure primarily reduce misvaluation through improved information environments or instead amplify valuation distortions through investor sentiment and belief reinforcement. Design/methodology/approach Using Chinese A-share firms from 2009 to 2020, stock misvaluation is measured as the deviation between market value and estimated intrinsic value under the Rhodes-Kropf-style misvaluation framework. ESG data are sourced from Huazheng, with Wind data used for robustness, alongside endogeneity checks using 2SLS and dynamic GMM models. Findings Aggregate ESG performance exhibits only a weak association with stock misvaluation. In contrast, governance performance consistently improves price efficiency by reducing both overvaluation and undervaluation, while environmental and social dimensions exhibit weaker and less consistent effects. Although ESG disclosure is associated with lower information asymmetry, disclosure also strengthens the valuation effect of ESG performance. Practical implications The results suggest that strengthening corporate governance and ESG disclosure can enhance market efficiency in China. The findings are consistent with the view that greater ESG transparency may contribute to improved information environments. Investors should focus on governance quality rather than aggregate ESG scores, while firms should prioritize substantive governance improvements over symbolic ESG actions. Originality/value The study provides new evidence from an emerging market with voluntary ESG disclosure and a retail-investor-dominated structure. It highlights heterogeneous effects across ESG pillars, identifying governance as the primary driver of pricing efficiency. The findings suggest that ESG-related pricing effects in China reflect a combination of information, behaviour and signalling mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-02-2026-0083
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance matters: evidence from ESG performance and stock misvaluation in China

Yafeng Qin, Xiaoming Li, Qifang Feng
International Journal of Managerial Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Governance matters: evidence from ESG performance and stock misvaluation in China

Yafeng Qin, Xiaoming Li, Qifang Feng
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between firms' ESG performance, its three pillars as well as ESG disclosure and stock price efficiency in the Chinese stock market. It examines whether ESG engagement and ESG disclosure primarily reduce misvaluation through improved information environments or instead amplify valuation distortions through investor sentiment and belief reinforcement. Design/methodology/approach Using Chinese A-share firms from 2009 to 2020, stock misvaluation is measured as the deviation between market value and estimated intrinsic value under the Rhodes-Kropf-style misvaluation framework. ESG data are sourced from Huazheng, with Wind data used for robustness, alongside endogeneity checks using 2SLS and dynamic GMM models. Findings Aggregate ESG performance exhibits only a weak association with stock misvaluation. In contrast, governance performance consistently improves price efficiency by reducing both overvaluation and undervaluation, while environmental and social dimensions exhibit weaker and less consistent effects. Although ESG disclosure is associated with lower information asymmetry, disclosure also strengthens the valuation effect of ESG performance. Practical implications The results suggest that strengthening corporate governance and ESG disclosure can enhance market efficiency in China. The findings are consistent with the view that greater ESG transparency may contribute to improved information environments. Investors should focus on governance quality rather than aggregate ESG scores, while firms should prioritize substantive governance improvements over symbolic ESG actions. Originality/value The study provides new evidence from an emerging market with voluntary ESG disclosure and a retail-investor-dominated structure. It highlights heterogeneous effects across ESG pillars, identifying governance as the primary driver of pricing efficiency. The findings suggest that ESG-related pricing effects in China reflect a combination of information, behaviour and signalling mechanisms.

International Journal of Managerial Finance
Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Department of Finance (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.