Assessment of cabin filtration efficiency: contribution to an on-road methodology

Abstract. The use of cabin filters provides protection for passengers against outdoor pollution caused by particles (aerosols) when travelling by car. Their filtration efficiency is assessed through rigorous laboratory studies in accordance with standards. However, there are few or no comparable studies conducted under real road conditions using reference particle measurements to complement the laboratory results. In this context, our study aims to contribute to the improvement of on-road aerosol measurement by evaluating cabin filters with gravimetric measurements. To this end, a sampling line upstream of the cabin filter in an area located under the windscreen, and a sampling point downstream of the cabin filter on the front seat inside the cabin were designed. The sampling efficiency of the sampling line was calculated using a transdisciplinary work involving Computational Fluid Dynamics, wind tunnel measurements and numerical methods. The results showed that its sampling efficiency for PM1 and PM2.5 (i.e., particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than 1 and 2.5 µm, respectively) is greater than 94 and 77 %, respectively. Next, on road tests were carried out in a moving car in the Paris region, for two different cabin filters and during tests without a cabin filter. The average filtration efficiency was 51.4 % (n=15), 52.7 % (n=14) and 9.5 % (n=4) for PM1 and 57.3 % (n=9), 56 % (n=9) and 32 % (n=4) for PM2.5, respectively, for Filter A, Filter B and without a cabin filter. Lastly, optical counters were simultaneously operated with gravimetric measurements. The results showed that optical counters underestimate the concentration of PM2.5, highlighting the importance of using a reference method to measure the particles under real road conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol Research
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-559-2026
Primary Topic
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Assessment of cabin filtration efficiency: contribution to an on-road methodology

Sébastien Fable, Cécile Raventos, Ambre Delater, Isabelle Coll et al.
Aerosol Research
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
article

Assessment of cabin filtration efficiency: contribution to an on-road methodology

Sébastien Fable, Cécile Raventos, Ambre Delater, Isabelle Coll, Jessica Queron, Brice Berthelot, Olivier Le Bihan
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The use of cabin filters provides protection for passengers against outdoor pollution caused by particles (aerosols) when travelling by car. Their filtration efficiency is assessed through rigorous laboratory studies in accordance with standards. However, there are few or no comparable studies conducted under real road conditions using reference particle measurements to complement the laboratory results. In this context, our study aims to contribute to the improvement of on-road aerosol measurement by evaluating cabin filters with gravimetric measurements. To this end, a sampling line upstream of the cabin filter in an area located under the windscreen, and a sampling point downstream of the cabin filter on the front seat inside the cabin were designed. The sampling efficiency of the sampling line was calculated using a transdisciplinary work involving Computational Fluid Dynamics, wind tunnel measurements and numerical methods. The results showed that its sampling efficiency for PM1 and PM2.5 (i.e., particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than 1 and 2.5 µm, respectively) is greater than 94 and 77 %, respectively. Next, on road tests were carried out in a moving car in the Paris region, for two different cabin filters and during tests without a cabin filter. The average filtration efficiency was 51.4 % (n=15), 52.7 % (n=14) and 9.5 % (n=4) for PM1 and 57.3 % (n=9), 56 % (n=9) and 32 % (n=4) for PM2.5, respectively, for Filter A, Filter B and without a cabin filter. Lastly, optical counters were simultaneously operated with gravimetric measurements. The results showed that optical counters underestimate the concentration of PM2.5, highlighting the importance of using a reference method to measure the particles under real road conditions.

Aerosol ResearchVol. 4(2)
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques (FR), Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (FR)
Ministero della transizione ecologica, Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie, Agence de la transition écologique
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon